Replies

http://www.beyondweird.com/ufos/Branton_The_Omega_File_Part_2_Nazi_Bases_In_Antarctica.html
.................
Ever wonder why Admiral byrd got his ass kicked in antartica and came home only in weeks instead of months with storys of death and destruction of his forces that boggled minds.
.............................
http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=crashes&action=display&num=1213998668

QUOTE: “The Expedition completed its Mission in less than two months and left the region after having made major geographical discoveries”

QUOTE: “The Admiral stated that in his opinion the Expedition had established a precedent without parallel as regards the rapidity with which the geographical discoveries were made.”

Here one asks, “Without parallel in comparison to what?”. Was there some kind of timetable to make “the geographical discoveries”?

QUOTE: “As regards the recently terminated Expedition, Admiral Byrd said that the most important result of the observations and discoveries made was the bearing which these had on the security of the United States.”

The Admiral then went on to say:
QUOTE: “I am in a position perhaps better than any other person to realize the significance of how to use the scientific knowledge in these explorations because I can make comparisons. Twenty years ago I made my first Antarctic Expedition.”

If the Admiral was making comparisons between what he saw now and what he saw twenty years ago, this implies that something relating to the geography of Antarctica must have changed. Otherwise there would be no point in making a comparison because everything would be the same. This might also explain the true Mission of the Expedition: to investigate the topographical changes. (Byrd was obviously referring to the Byrd Expedition I of 1928-1930 when he was in the area between 150° and 180° from the Pole on the Pacific side. It would be here that the geographical change had most likely occurred.)

In what way did these geographical discoveries and observations adversely affect the security of the United States?

QUOTE: “Admiral Richard E Byrd warned today of the need for the United States to adopt protective measures against the possibility of invasion of the country by hostile aircraft proceeding from the polar regions. ‘I don’t want to scare anybody but the bitter reality is that in the event of a new war the United States will be attacked by aircraft flying in from one or both poles.”

On three occasions in the article Admiral Byrd warned of “invasion of the country”. This term does not mean invasion of air space, it means invasion of the United States by a foreign Power. In 1947 the United States was the world’s only super Power. The threat to the security of the United States was of attack and invasion by aircraft proceeding from the polar regions. One of the main reasons for Admiral Byrd’s early return was to warn his countrymen to prepare defences against this threat. He could have reported his findings by signal but instead he decided to head for home, so urgent was what he had to communicate.

When one considers the logistics which would be involved in operating an aerial invasion force to vanquish and take over the United States starting from the South Pole we see at once that the idea is nonsensical UNLESS the enemy force is vastly superior in weaponry and in anti-electronic warfare. This is the reason why so many commentators have seen the presence of an alien force stationed presumably in the other dimension in Antarctica.

So, what did Admiral Byrd see in Antarctica which led him to believe that an imminent threat of attack against the United States existed? What were the geographical changes to Antarctica which he had seen “by comparison”? If he was mentally ill he would have been replaced, but it does appear that he enjoyed the full support of his commanders in his decision.