Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 26 February 2017

Various driveby media television networks ^ | 26 February 2017 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

[Alas Babylon!]

The Talk Shows

Feb 26th, 2017

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Govs. Scott Walker, R-Wis., and Terry McAuliffe, D-Va.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; Gov. John Hickenlooper, D-Colo.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Gov. John Kasich, R-Ohio; former CIA Director John Brennan.

THIS WEEK (ABC): House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California; Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio; White House Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.; Gov. Chris Christie, R-N.J.; Reps. Mark Sanford, R-S.C., and Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz. (Note: No Trump Admin types. CNN=VERY Fake news!)

[arrogantsob]

Unlikely that the Nazis would need him to accomplish their purposes.

[Freee-dame]

Robby Mook, Hillary's campaign manager, created the entire "Russians hacked into the DNC computers and helped Trump with the election" bit. He went on CNN on July 24, 2016 and told Jake Tapper that the Russians did it. Instead of "Sources say," he used "experts said" even when pressed (a little) by Tapper. I remember this so clearly.

After Mook's appearance on CNN, the rest of the media picked it up citing "experts" on CNN. Of course there never were any names associated with this accusation.

It's the same every time. One MSM makes something up then the others say, "according to that MSM", as if that gives a statement credence. Soon all the low information voters believe the lies.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

"in our galaxy"

That really cuts down on the probability.

1961

We might want to see some more recent numbers.

[OK]

“I have seen no credible evidence that Brennan is a Moslem.”

---

Here is an article examining the issue.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/10/john-brennan-is-completely-unqualified-to-be-director-of-central-intelligence

[Alas Babylon!]

We might want to see some more recent numbers.

Why? The equation itself doesn't change. The math is still the same.

Plus I addressed the other galaxies. As below:

No matter how low the probability that any given galaxy will have intelligent life, the galaxy that we are in must have at least one intelligent species by definition (us). There could be hundreds of galaxies in our galactic cluster with no intelligent life whatsoever (or each with hundreds of species), but of course we would not be present in those galaxies to observe this fact.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

of course we would not be present in those galaxies to observe this fact.

Oh sure. A Vorlonian metrionic enigmal conumdrum. Throwing me a position that cannot be debated. Thanks a lot.

Of course I can answer with a hypothetical calculated probability, of the number of possible remote highly-advanced alien civilizations.

In the words of the late great Carl Sagan:

Billions and billions and billions.

[arrogantsob]

It takes more than unsourced insinuation to be convincing.

[AbolishCSEU]

He only said “oh sure” and agreed with Maria when she forced him to. Period.dot.
Go back to posting on WaPo/HuffPo
I aplologize for nothing.

[AbolishCSEU]

Oh, and by the way, I wholeheartedly suggest you change your telling screen name of “fision” to “fishin’ “

[fision]

Grow up.