Posted on 02/23/2017 4:10:21 AM PST by Texas Fossil
A US appeals court has ruled that military-style assault weapons are not protected under the US Constitution, dealing a blow to gun rights activists. In a 10-4 ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, said the 45 assault weapons banned under Maryland's law are not protected by the Second Amendment. 'Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to the weapons of war,' wrote Judge Robert King, adding that the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly excluded such coverage.
While the Second Amendment guarantees Americans the right to bear arms, legal battles have raged for years over what the guarantee includes. The ruling upheld a law from Maryland, which bans 45 different kinds of assault weapons and sets the limit on gun magazines to 10 rounds.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Miller’s original attorney didn’t show up either. Further Miller argued against the constitutionlaity of the 1934 gun control act which specifically infringed upon the very firearms which the ruling claimed the 2nd amendment protected. It was a travesty.
Yes, constitutionally speaking.
Actually, yes. In colonial times it was completely common for ship owners to own the equivalent in armament of a Navy destroyer. See "privateer" among other categories.
Of course the people are the militia. But the right MUST apply to the people otherwise only “the militia” is allowed to have weapons. This is what leftists have been trying to push for decades by saying the National Guard represents the militia so only they should be allowed to own arms. The 2A is a right of the people. The People is the subject of the right provided in the amendment, not the militia.
Terrible miscarriage of justice based upon utter ignorance.
Appeal, appeal, appeal.
Yep. I’m sure the NRA and ILA are bending congressmen’s ears at this moment.
I know that.
Do a little research before you post nonsense.
I stated a fact. Why don't you bite me.
Yes, and in fact, the entire "Bill of Rights."
Isn’t this in direct contradiction to “Miller?”
Yes, ComDem fuzzy legal logic.
Awhile ago I read up on “privateers”. We didn’t have much of a navy back then, so most of our ships were private. At one point the navy had three ships in the water and the privateers had over 450!
It is estimated that 13,000 privateers died - mostly while being held captive in the prison ships in New York harbor. (And then dumped into the water when they died). Compare that to the estimated 6,800 total U.S. deaths due to combat.
Thank God that our Founders had the wisdom to recognize our God-given right to own weapons with which to overthrow our own government. And I pray that we will never have to use it as they did during the Revolution.
http://longislandgenealogy.com/prison.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.