Posted on 02/22/2017 6:15:25 AM PST by detective
Yes I want to use the U.S. judicial system—the immigration courts in particular-- to jam, to backlog it so perhaps President Trump will change his mind and stop this ridiculous policy-- this unpleasant and hostile policy-- of deporting people..” (Jorge Castañeda to Tucker Carlson, Fox News, 2/14/17.) The “ridiculous policy”consists of President Trump’s executive orders to deport lawbreaking foreigners, mostly Mexicans. In other words, this “unpleasant and hostile policy” consists of Presidential candidate Trump’s fulfillment of his campaign pledges and of President Trump’s fulfillment of his pledge with his hand on the Bible on Jan. 20th—to uphold the U.S. Constitution.
The Mexican government itself has pledged $50 million in legal defense funds towards this jamming of U.S. courts as planned and promoted by Jorge Castañeda, who was introduced by Tucker Carlson as “Mexico’s former Foreign Minister, also a NYU professor and Board member of Human Rights Watch.”
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
Appoint a thousand or so temporary judges working only deportation cases until the backlog is reduced to manageable. A good resume enhancer for a lot of young lawyers.
I've said for years that any public assistance payments made to foreign nationals should be deducted from whatever foreign aid that country receives and reimbursed to the paying state, city or agency. It's simple and would be effective in easing the tax burden on Americans. They don't listen.
Great idea.
95% of defendants do not go to case. Otherwise the 5% can treat it like Traffic Court. Approved judicial proceeding, same legal rights, just more similar rights for illegals versus the Supreme Court.
Sounds like Trump will have to appoint some new Republican Judges due to backlog. BYE
Either create or designate a court specifically to handle these cases.
All the illegals who are awaiting trial are either impounded in camps or jails or voluntarily leave our country and wait to be notified just before their case is called.
Problem solved.>>> very cool. make it like IRS court guilty until proven innocent no appeal.
Read the entire article.
Castaneda is not only NOT a friend of the US, he’s not even a real friend of Mexico!
PING!
Can President Trump issue an Executive order stopping all wire transfers of money by illegals to Mexico, and make it unlawful for illegal aliens and immigrants to claim dependents unless the dependents are living in the US.
The “ridiculous policy” is enforcing the people’s laws, passed by the people’s representatives in Congress assembled and signed by Presidents chosen in the ordinary way.
The notion that we cannot live under the laws we make is at the root of this whole matter.
Why do we need judges and courts to “work on deportation cases”?
What is there for courts to do? We need boxcars - lots of ‘em - but we don’t need courts.
Rule of law & due process, without which some legals who have not bothered to learn enough English would get taken out with the trash. I forget who said it, but one of the founders thought it better that a bunch of guilty men go free than one innocent be unjustly punished.
OK, it wasn’t a founder at all; it was a British judge whose reasoning carried on into our legal thinking.
(From Wiki)
In criminal law, Blackstone’s formulation is the principle that: “It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer”,...as expressed by the English jurist William Blackstone in his seminal work, Commentaries on the Laws of England, published in the 1760s.
So instead of hiring 10,000 more ICE agents maybe we should hire 10,000 more immigration judges?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.