Posted on 02/20/2017 10:42:51 AM PST by johnk
According to Townhalls and frequent Fox News contributor Guy Benson, controversial Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos has been disinvited from speaking at the upcoming Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in DC, a report that was quickly confirmed by the ACU Chair.
Milo will be disinvited from #CPAC, Ive just been told.
Guy Benson (@guypbenson) February 20, 2017
Yiannopoulos initial invitation drew criticism, especially after a questionable clip emerged on social media revealing the Breitbart editor appearing to at least advocate for pedophilia. The clip, which was first put online by The Reagan Battalion, quickly made the rounds Sunday; Yiannopoulos says in the video:
Excellent.
It’s been known for centuries that homosexuality and pedirasty are entwined like the cords of a rope.
Jonah has been a vocal NeverTrumper from day one. He has much of his mother’s traits which in the past here on FR was to make trouble.
Obviously one or the other.
You speak of Jerry Sandusky, assistant coach of the Penn State Football team.
Abuse went on for 30+ years.
This disgusting scum bag would be in the field house showers raping young boys, while tours of Penn State alumni would be going through the same facility.
I present to you the child molesting felon Jerry Sandusky:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jerry-sandusky-trial-victim-6-testifies-about-icky-shower-encounter/
“supporting Roman Polanski and giving standing ovations to Woody Allen.”
Both those victims were post-pubescent. The conduct was predatory and despicable, but not pedophilic.
“Milo did write, I do not support pedophilia. Period. It is a vile and disgusting crime”
It certainly seems that over time, the culture wars are being won by the left, incrementally through moral relativism. Western society was once defined by Christian beliefs and values, and the definition of “conservative” dovetailed quite well with those beliefs and values. At one time, becoming sexually active wasn’t an issue of age so much as it was of being married. Back then, a conservative conference would never think to have a speaker who was cohabiting with a “partner”. Likewise, probably wouldn’t have a divorced person headlining the event either. More recently, but still some decades ago, there’s absolutely no way a homosexual would be a keynote speaker at a conservative conference either. Now, it seems as though a sodomite being a keynote speaker is just about fine, so long as he/she isn’t a pedo as well. Perhaps in another decade or so a transgender or polygamist will be acceptable so long as they’re not into sex with animals. I can’t imagine, nor do I want to know, what comes after that.
Good observation that Trump has a sense of who should be up on the podium with him and who should not be.
Notice how Sarah Palin no longer has visibility with Trump, after her initial appearance with him in Iowa last year.
Her shrill, incoherent speaking style did her in.
GOPe gutless wonders
I can’t stand CPAC but they were right to boot Milo... he’s a fraud who the left has now propped up and created.
Excellent decision on CPAC’s part.
Your arguments are all over the place.
BTW you may not care now but some day you will.
The God’s honest truth is that there is right and wrong, whether you acknowledge it or not.
It is like gravity. You may not like it, but go jump off a building and see what happens. God has established truths and laws, we all live and are judged by them. All of us.
“Romans 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.”
I stand with Milo. F-CPAC.
You are correct.
Once one crosses the line to homosexuality, the abhorrence of other sexual practices is a mere matter of taste, like preferring strawberry to chocolate ice cream. There is no logical reason not to indulge further as one’s emotions lead.
I agree.
Several such videos have appeared; Milo also defended pedophilia on his FB page.
He is NOT a conservative and his sick views are beyond the pale.
If conservatives stand for anything, its being committed to upholding core values.
CPAC made the right move.
I find it disheartening how “the enemy of my enemy has become my friend” has crept its way into both Christianity and conservatism.
Milo has finally jumped the shark... though he did this long ago, and only a few people caught on.
maybe now the normies will have had their fill. This latest iteration of Milo 2.0 is a making of the left and their over the top protests of him.
People “formerly’ close to him have told me it’s unclear what he actually believes other than in himself and his celebratory celebrity.
Milo has finally jumped the shark... though he did this long ago, and only a few people caught on.
maybe now the normies will have had their fill. This latest iteration of Milo 2.0 is a making of the left and their over the top protests of him.
People “formerly’ close to him have told me it’s unclear what he actually believes other than in himself and his celebratory celebrity.
“CPAC wouldve been happier with Hillary in the White House.”
This is so true, I wish more people understood what these people really promote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.