Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s Labor Nominee Let Bill Clinton’s Pedophile Buddy Off The Hook
We Are Change ^ | 2/16/2016 | Cassandra Failrbanks

Posted on 02/19/2017 10:02:10 PM PST by Tours

On Thursday, President Donald Trump named Alexander Acosta as his new nominee for secretary of labor — the same man who cut a sweetheart plea deal with billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in 2008.

Acosta, while working as the top federal prosecutor in Miami, agreed not to file any federal charges against Epstein — who was accused of having sex with dozens of underage teen girls — in exchange for him pleading guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution and soliciting a minor for prostitution. The infamous pedophile had been accused of recruiting dozens of underage girls into a sex-slave network. Epstein was known for flying wealthy friends, including Bill Clinton, on his private plane dubbed “the Lolita Express,” to a private Caribbean island, known as “Orgy Island.” According to flight logs, Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s private plane 26 times from 2001 to 2003. It was alleged that Epstein had hidden cameras all over his property so that he could film prominent people having sex with the minors for use as blackmail material.

Despite the incredibly disturbing allegations in his case, Epstein was only sentenced to 18-months in a county jail. He ultimately served around 13 months, much to the dismay of his victims — who filed a lawsuit over the handling of the case in 2008. “The Government and Epstein conspired to conceal the NPA (non-prosecution agreement) from the victims to prevent them from joining any objection, and to avoid the firestorm of controversy that would have arisen if it had become known that the Government was immunizing a politically-connected billionaire and all of his conspiracies from the prosecutions of hundreds of federal crimes against minor girls,” attorneys for Epstein’s victims wrote in a court filing for their lawsuit against the government. LawNewz notes that “recent filings in the case also raise legitimate questions about what else prosecutors would have discovered if the federal investigation had not come to an abrupt end with the promise of no prosecution by the feds.” Acosta is not named in the lawsuit over the handling of the Epstein case, but it will surely become a heated topic during his upcoming confirmation hearing.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: acosta; epstein; laborsecretary; pizzagate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2017 10:02:10 PM PST by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tours

Oh...crap!


2 posted on 02/19/2017 10:02:44 PM PST by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Good.Grief. Who is advising President Trump to choose such a reprobate for his Cabinet? Anyone who has been in a Bush administration should be automatically disqualified.


3 posted on 02/19/2017 10:05:36 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tours

I admit to being sickened by the way high ranking pedos get their wrists slapped. I’d like to know more about how this guy facilitated the deal or whether he too was given an offer he couldn’t refuse. Because Epstein was not the top of the pedo chain here. His boss must have put unholy “pressure” onto this deal.


4 posted on 02/19/2017 10:07:28 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

Trump was elected to drain the swamp, not to restock it with the same old gators.


5 posted on 02/19/2017 10:09:34 PM PST by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tours

wow a candidate worse than Pudzer.


6 posted on 02/19/2017 10:10:07 PM PST by proust (Trump / Pence 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Trump covering up Pizzagate.


7 posted on 02/19/2017 10:10:55 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

I firmly believe Epstein was just a small, albeit important cog, in a very vast machinery. Blackmail incorporated....


8 posted on 02/19/2017 10:11:56 PM PST by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I hope not, but......


9 posted on 02/19/2017 10:12:45 PM PST by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: proust

Trump should withdrawl his name asap.


10 posted on 02/19/2017 10:13:45 PM PST by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Agreed. He was a big dog as he was doing all the dirty work, but he was made very rich and had all the “fun” he wanted along the way.

And his audio and video collection went to whoever his boss(es) is(are).


11 posted on 02/19/2017 10:14:48 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Despite the incredibly disturbing allegations ...


Allegations don’t make a case. There may not have been enough hard evidence to convict him.

Epstein is worth a lot of money and could afford the lawyers to get him off. It’s what they do. He may have walked without serving any time if for not striking a plea deal.

I won’t bash him without having more facts.


12 posted on 02/19/2017 10:14:57 PM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Cog


13 posted on 02/19/2017 10:15:02 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Isn’t this just dandy. : (


14 posted on 02/19/2017 10:33:20 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tours

This is all in President Trump’s master plan to put the Clintons in prison.

Acosta will have a confirmation hearing and at that hearing Republican senators will ask him all about Epstein and Epstein’s involvement with Bill Clinton.

He will be under oath and have to tell the truth.


15 posted on 02/19/2017 10:42:03 PM PST by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

“There may not have been enough hard evidence to convict him.”
They convicted him in a state court over what definitely should have been a Federal prosecution. They had the evidence. The Feds bowed out under Acosta. Or, more likely, he was given an offer he couldn’t refuse.


16 posted on 02/19/2017 10:45:35 PM PST by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

LOL.


17 posted on 02/19/2017 10:47:06 PM PST by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

You forgot the sarcasm tag...


18 posted on 02/19/2017 10:48:12 PM PST by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

“This is all in President Trump’s master plan to put the Clintons in prison....”

You really expect the Republicans to ask him those kind of questions? I would be very surprised if they had the guts to do so. Epstein is protected by some very powerful and...dangerous people.


19 posted on 02/19/2017 10:48:45 PM PST by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Ping me when any Senator asks him any question about Epstein. Less than one in a million chance.


20 posted on 02/19/2017 11:04:12 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson