George Bush’s critics aren’t qualified to carry his brief case. Yourself included.
Perhaps faux conservative like yourself would have preferred Al Gore to have been president on 9/11. Maybe that would have made the BDS crowd happy — but I doubt it. They don’t seem to be happy unless they’re condemning someone for something that they really don’t understand very well.
And the fact that he happened to be president when Barney Frank’s housing bomb went off was sheer cuicidence — it certainly wasn’t a “disgrace”.
Actually, this country probably would have been better off if Donald Trump had been president on 9/11. The Bush administration's bungling of our foreign and military affairs after 9/11 is a big reason why Trump is the president now ... and why Jeb Bush's 2016 campaign was a complete 'effing disaster.
I'll stack my conservative credentials up against anyone here on FreeRepublic, so I don't know why you'd call be a "faux conservative." A lot of here on FreeRepublic back in 2001 looked at a 9/11 attack that was carried out by radical Islamic terrorists from Saudi Arabia and had every reason to question a decision by the U.S. government to invade Iraq and topple a government that: (1) was brutally effective in suppressing radical Islam in its own borders, and (2) was one of the few countries in the Middle East that actually had a strong Christian presence.
P.S. -- I would have no interest in carrying George Bush's brief case. It was probably filled with Marvel comic books anyway.