[freedumb2003]

>>I remember that Traditionalists were mocked by the LGBT community and the MSM that the arguments used to identify a so called Constitutional right to gay marriage can be used to legalize polygamy. <<

I have NEVER seen a reasonable answer to the question of, given the “rationale” of gay “marriage,” why not incest marriages, polygamy/polyandry, etc. Any number of 2:n people of any sex/gender is allowed under the rules for gay “marriage.”

I am surprised it has taken this long.

Marriage as an institution in the USA died after the very first state sanctioned gay “marriage.”

[Nifster]

The government should never have been involved in marriage, which is a religious right, in the first place.

For years it wasn’t. Then they got the bright idea that they could increase control if they did

[onedoug]

I will never bake the cake.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Marriage as an institution in the USA died after the acceptance of easy divorce and contraception.

We sawed two legs off of a four-legged chair—— free, faithful, fertile and for life —— and feign surprise that the chair collapsed.