Skip to comments.
Russia 'deploys cruise missile in violation of landmark arms control treaty with US'
The Telegraph ^
| February 14, 2017
| By David Lawler
Posted on 02/14/2017 1:00:54 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
This story began with the New York Times so it's difficult to say how valid it is.
To: Brad from Tennessee
“Administration officials” ?? What department, what officials? I would first suspect that the NY Times, and certain bureaucrats, are trying to reignite the Cold war. Or even a hot war. So they can blame it on Trump.
2
posted on
02/14/2017 1:04:10 PM PST
by
Old_Grouch
(69 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
0bama drew a line in the line, whoda thought?
3
posted on
02/14/2017 1:06:03 PM PST
by
TYVets
To: Brad from Tennessee
Cruise missiles have been banned since 1897? The NYT nails it again!
4
posted on
02/14/2017 1:06:32 PM PST
by
MeganC
(Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
1st 3 paragraphs are about the violation under Obama.
The last 9 paragraphs are about Pres.Trump & his staff being tied to Russia...
Time to step up to this and out anyone remotely involved and I’m not talking about Pres. Trump and his appointees......
5
posted on
02/14/2017 1:06:57 PM PST
by
stylin19a
(Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
To: Brad from Tennessee
6
posted on
02/14/2017 1:07:08 PM PST
by
SolidRedState
(I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
To: TYVets
How about a line in the sand
7
posted on
02/14/2017 1:07:13 PM PST
by
TYVets
To: Brad from Tennessee
Is Russia even bound by treaties entered into by the Czar? There have been a lot of changes in management since 1897, and certainly a lot of changes in missile technology.
the landmark 1897 accord that banned the US and Soviet Union
Or, perhaps, British journalists are as big a bunch of idiots as US journalists. I won't believe it until RT covers it.
8
posted on
02/14/2017 1:10:39 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: Brad from Tennessee
that the test violated the landmark 1897 accord Technology back then was more advanced than I was led to believe.
9
posted on
02/14/2017 1:14:06 PM PST
by
gdani
To: Brad from Tennessee
Such a shame, really, that the missile treaty between President McKinley and Tsar Nicholas II couldn’t last more than 130 years.
10
posted on
02/14/2017 1:16:15 PM PST
by
ExGeeEye
(For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Remember what Comm-rad Stain said , “Treaties are like the crust of a pie. You have to be broken to get at the Goodies inside the pie.”
11
posted on
02/14/2017 1:18:02 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country.)
To: Brad from Tennessee; All
Vlad picked a good time to test America.
12
posted on
02/14/2017 1:18:43 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isn't common any more.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
...contending that the test violated the landmark 1897 accord... Brits still haven't gotten over bombarding Fort McHenry.
To: SolidRedState
“1897” is in the original.
#FakeNews strikes again.
14
posted on
02/14/2017 1:19:05 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(The Washington Post is Jeff Bezos' Fake News unregulated SuperPAC.)
To: Uncle Miltie; SolidRedState; PAR35; gdani
We’re a bunch of smart-asses.
Beats the alternative (lookin’ at the fake media dumb-asses).
15
posted on
02/14/2017 1:21:31 PM PST
by
ExGeeEye
(For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
I’m seeing all sorts of published dirt posted about Russia these days.
Long range bombers were flying in international airspace off Britain’s coast.
Yesterday I got a text message from FoxNews that Russia had a spying ship off the East Coast.
Now this cruise missile story is published.
Two of three of these things are absolutely non-events. Those reports cause me to question the third.
What is really going on here?
Man the media wants WWIII. What the heck is that all about?
Is that the only way they can become relevant again?
Obama, McCain, Clinton, Amnesty International, the U.S. MSM... the list grows longer the number of entities that seem to want WWIII.
Maybe we should drop some bombs on them and pal up with Russia.
I know this will tweak the Putin haters. I’m not fond of him either, but this ramp up the WWIII talk, is more dangerous than he is.
16
posted on
02/14/2017 1:30:15 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
To: gdani
Technology back then was more advanced than I was led to believe. Listen to the "Star Spangled Banner" again. Wasn't Key writing about cruise missiles? "The rocket's red glare..." /s
17
posted on
02/14/2017 1:31:46 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: Brad from Tennessee
The Russians have no regard for treaties.
18
posted on
02/14/2017 1:47:18 PM PST
by
DarthVader
("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
To: MeganC
Cruise missiles have been banned since 1897? Must have been written by Jules Verne. That guy really was ahead of his time!
19
posted on
02/14/2017 2:51:47 PM PST
by
Hugin
(Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
20
posted on
02/14/2017 2:59:13 PM PST
by
dforest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson