Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump White House Files Paperwork For En Banc Hearing At Ninth Circuit Over Executive Order
Townhall ^ | Feb 13, 2017 3:42 PM | Matt Vespa

Posted on 02/14/2017 8:08:39 AM PST by GonzoII

The Trump administration is filing paper work for an en banc hearing of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that initially voted unanimously to keep the temporary restraining order on the president’s executive order on immigration in place.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; bordersecurity; first100days; trump; trump45; trumpeo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Brilliant
"My suspicion is that now that the Virginia court has ruled "

I didn't catch Virginia court decision...what happened...

21 posted on 02/14/2017 8:28:41 AM PST by GonzoII ("If the new crime be, to believe in God, let us all be criminals" -Sheen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Trump should IGNORE any court ruling that usurps his presidential authority. The LAW is clearly stated and Trump is within his rights to carry on regardless what the courts say.


22 posted on 02/14/2017 8:29:35 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing (im)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Why not drag it out and wait to Neil Gorsuch is confirmed. Have a better chance to win at the Supreme court level, a 4-4 tie means the 9th circuit decision holds, until such time another case gets to the Supreme Court, and there is a 5-4 decision either way.

Trump can always have another Executive order to issue, let the libs play there hand in court, find out what will fly muster, and then hit them again harder later.


23 posted on 02/14/2017 8:32:15 AM PST by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

The only lawful response to lower courts, is that they have no jurisdiction.

USConstitution says SCOTUS has Original Jurisdiction.

Why do Pres. Trump and his advisors refuse to follow the law? Allowing low courts to say anything about the subject? This is weakening proper law in USA; eroding foundations.


24 posted on 02/14/2017 8:33:09 AM PST by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USA completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

IMO this is not a mistake as it’s maximizing all his opportunities. Other than this, he could only appeal to the SC directly or, as you said, rewrite the EO.

This way he’s looking for the small chance that a larger panel from the circuit will rule in his favor to keep the EO intact. Otherwise if they rule to keep it in place again, I suspect at that point Trump will rewrite the order.

He’s just going for the Hail Mary at this point and he loses nothing by doing so. If he rewrote it now, he would be giving up before he had to, and he will have to rewrite it anyway if they rule against him. So there’s nothing really lost here.

I suppose one could argue suffering another legal setback would be harmful for his momentum and/or mandate. So would rewriting the order now (it would be admitting defeat before all options are exhausted) so that’s a push IMO.

It doesn’t hurt to try when all negativites are equal.


25 posted on 02/14/2017 8:40:28 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CTrent1564

An attempt to have this heard in the SC would take months (and as you said a 4-4 tie will throw the decision back to the 9th) so a case that will take months to sort out in the SC is kind of pointless in this situation since we are talking about an EO that has a term of 90 days.

By the time it was resolved the 90 days would be over. Kind of moot at that point no matter how it was decided.

Also, on top of all that, if this is put on the SC’s shoulders then the confirmation process of Gorsuch will become hopelessly entangled in the politicization surrounding this case. We could end up losing a perfectly good justice just for a case who’s merits will not even exist in 3 months.


26 posted on 02/14/2017 8:46:14 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Why are they wasting their time with this?

Because the Judiciary has over-stepped its constitutional boundaries and left unchallenged, a dangerous legal precedent is being set where the Courts (with ZERO National Intelligence Role or briefings) determine foreign policy, rather than the Executive Branch -- which DOES have the Constitutional responsibility of.

It's time to smack down the over-reaching judicial system. Long over due. Go Trump!

27 posted on 02/14/2017 8:48:36 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Somebody tell Trump to just write a new EO he won’t win in the ninth


28 posted on 02/14/2017 8:57:39 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Nooooo. Unless they can guarantee a SCITUs victory....and no one can do that. Just write a new EO


29 posted on 02/14/2017 8:59:09 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

And SCOTUS is four four tie which leaves whatever the ninth decides in place


30 posted on 02/14/2017 9:01:20 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
This is the proper course of action. The Ninth knows that the decision as written is malarkey. Now the Chief Justice and 10 of the 29 can have a chance to save their own skins. It is opening another door to victory that wasn't there yet. There's no down side, and a massive potential upside.

If it goes to SCOTUS, the judges should knock it down easily... but then again, they were supposed to knock down ObamaCare, too.

31 posted on 02/14/2017 9:05:32 AM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

As of now maybe but Gorsuch is on his way and it will take a fair amount of time to get to the SCt. Besides which I am not sure this will be decided on party lines. The law is very clear and Trump wins.


32 posted on 02/14/2017 9:11:53 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Another district court has enjoined the order. But the court is in VA so the Ninth has no role.


33 posted on 02/14/2017 9:13:29 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Yeah and John Roberts voted against Obama care

As currently stacked SCOTUS is a crap shoot

Plus you are delusional if you think Gorsuch is going to make it anytime soon


34 posted on 02/14/2017 9:15:26 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII; Farmer Dean; Buckeye McFrog; 7thson; Principled; traderrob6; JerseyDvl; chris37; ...

Trump should halt the refugee program completely, while he challenges the court ruling.

Trump should issue a new executive order that limits refugee count to 35,000 or whatever has already come through. Thus stopping the refugee program for this year. He already limited it to 50,000 down from Obama’s 130,000 and it wasn’t challenged. He doesn’t even need an executive order to do this. He simply needs to write a letter to Congress informing them.

Now that the armchair pundits have had a chance to review the 9th ruling, Trump should go before the entire 9th with revised briefings. That way he will get any dissenting opinions in writing from that court before he goes to SCOTUS.


35 posted on 02/14/2017 9:17:12 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

It doesn’t have to get there soon. It won’t get to the SCt for at least a few months. And if one of the appeals Courts upholds it it may never get there. And if it does then the 4-4 split may uphold Trump.


36 posted on 02/14/2017 9:21:18 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

Another argument for going before the en banc 9th circuit is that, although they will rule against the EO, they will write an opinion that will help the DOJ write the next EO so that it can address their problems with the original EO. They will agree with the 3 judge panel on due process, but they may write something new, like an objection based on Establishment.


37 posted on 02/14/2017 9:29:19 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Why isn't anybody talking about Visa entry-exit tracking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Shut it ALL down for the time being .. redraft anything necessary in the interim and then, once Gorsuch is seated, take any challenges directly to the USSC.

/.02


Title 8 § 12 US Code Part II 1182 (f):
- - -
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

U.S. CodeTitle 8Chapter 12Subchapter IIPart II › § 1182 (f)

[emphasis added]

38 posted on 02/14/2017 9:33:51 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

yes he should do that, just effectively end the refugee program


39 posted on 02/14/2017 9:39:34 AM PST by Cubs Fan (Modern day liberals are the most intolerant, hateful, and violent people in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kabar

We don’t really need to use fake news to win - the 9th isn’t overruled anywhere close to that often.


40 posted on 02/14/2017 9:46:18 AM PST by Unshackled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson