Posted on 02/12/2017 5:52:47 AM PST by saywhatagain
THOMAS, Chief Judge and En Banc Coordinator:
A judge on this court has made a sua sponte request that a vote be take as to whether the order issued by the three judge motions panel on February 9, 2017, should be reconsidered en banc.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Exactly! Our sovereignty is the issue on every front at this time. We stand in the way of central government...unelected...for the world in the form of the U.N. or some such corrupt group.
The US Constitution MUST be protected on every front against all attempts to dissolve it. All the flak about global warming is the same thing. Gang Up Time against the U.S. A. with multinational trade “Treaties” and International Groupies with Marxist Beliefs who MUST destroy American Sovereignty if they are to prevail.
We are in THE WAR for our future.
That or something from one of the other branches scared them.
I don't know how many judges have to vote in favor of the request for en banc review. It's a matter of internal Ninth Circuit Rules of Procedure. I'm too lazy to look those rules up, but I'm sure they are available online. Usually 50% (not necessarily a majority, but at least 50%) must vote for en banc review. That vote will occur after the briefs are submitted on Thursday.
“Once again, Trump has stumbled into an important jurisprudential point.”
Sounds like a jackass leftist who can’t concede a single point to Trump without insulting him in the same breath.
It appears the consensus regarding the argument made on behalf of President Trump was incomplete and weak. If true, I was curious why attorney preparation was so poor. Silly mistakes like that can not be made.
>
I think that was the real threat that prompted this action.
Impeachment was real and almost a guaranteed done deal.
>
And by what metric would you base THAT upon?
Has Congress gotten off its collective asses to *anything* against the rampant over-reach (aside from the few for bribery\like...low-hanging-fruit)?
>
They’d better do something about their activism.
>
Day late, $ short as they say re: their reputation. Still, see above.
Even without this list, the court overstepped its authority. The Judicial Branch which the court represents cannot intrude on the President’s rights as clearly defined in the Constitution and affirmed by the Legislative Branch.
It was an attempt to override the Constitution! It must not be allowed to stand as precident or our Constitution is worthless. That was their intent and corrupt purpose. They must be impeached and disbarred.
9th worried that there may be a huge push to disband them.....
.....or....the entire 9th circuit is saying “hey, we want to say F’ Trump also.”
They thought they were dealing with a traditional republican. They soon discovered they were NOT!
I would withdraw the current EO and reissue another which would void this whole CYA attempt. Let them sit there and boil in their own juices. Rinse and repeat until these freaks get the message. We know our republican con-gress are nothing more than pillow biters. Remove them from the game, they are less than useless.
Is this like SCOTUS...where a judge typically won’t grab a case unless he/she thinks they have the votes?
That’s exactly what I’ve been saying he should do, and I expect we’ll hear just that in a few days.
They have seriously misunderestimated him.
It’s posts like yours that keep me glued to FR.
Get rid of them they are obstructionists
“My guess is the sedition route.”
That’s my take on what they are trying to do. They are simply going to double down on stupid.
They are pretty used to being overturned.
Thanks for all the info!
.
The solution is dilution.
Split the Ninth.
I believe this action is basis what Trump is about to do, not that they consider their 3 judge decision wrong. I am sure they are aware how poorly written the decision was. But remember, if Obamacare can be turned into a tax then anything can be written in attempting to thwart Trump... anything.
The practice of “judge shopping” should be stopped, it certainly doesn’t help the rule of law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.