[laconic]

I have watched most of the election night coverage recently that has been posted on YouTube. It is fun to see CNN, the first two hours Tapper and Blitzer are dizzy with glee, by midnight they are extremely worried and by 2 am they are downright depressed. PBS has about seven commentators - the two “conservatives’ are David Brooks of the NY Times and Stuart Spencer (or is it Spencer Stuart?) who did such a wonderful job running Romney’s general election campaign. Brooks is on the point of flipping out, at one point hysterically claiming that this is “like Father Coughlin just won the presidency”. Spencer is worse than any Democrat with his bile. There is not one Trump leaner on a network funded by you and me, unwillingly with our tax money. They also have some hysterical nobodies shrieking about how bad this is, to the point where it is quite funny to watch, I laughed long and loud at them.

[sargon]

I saw that PBS coverage too. What a total biased joke it was.

I remember Pelosi coming on very early and acting like Hillary winning was a done deal and basically saying "Well, we have to go through the formality of counting the votes first".

I've reviewed virtually all the coverage from election night, and the extreme bias is plain for all to see.

Fox was probably the least biased, but that's not saying much, of course...

[sargon]

By the way, for sheer apocalyptic hysteria, nobody could ever outdo Richard Engel, chief foreign correspondent of NBC news. His raw malice and unhinged fear-mongering on election night were just breathtaking. The guy is a total piece of liberal sh!t.

[thulldud]

...Stuart Spencer (or is it Spencer Stuart?) who did such a wonderful job running Romney’s general election campaign.

That line reminded me of this Ogden Nash bit:

The camel has a single hump;
The dromedary, two;
Or else the other way around.
I'm never sure. Are you?