Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laconic
I saw that PBS coverage too. What a total biased joke it was.

I remember Pelosi coming on very early and acting like Hillary winning was a done deal and basically saying "Well, we have to go through the formality of counting the votes first".

I've reviewed virtually all the coverage from election night, and the extreme bias is plain for all to see.

Fox was probably the least biased, but that's not saying much, of course...

25 posted on 02/10/2017 12:28:58 PM PST by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: sargon

I’ve watched most of the coverage and you’re right; only Fox makes a try at being neutral. Katie Couric is on the Yahoo! News extended coverage with a group of left wing nuts. “Sargent” Shultz headlines Bloomberg’s eight hours and there is this bizarre extended coverage of Never Trump conservatives led by Glenn Beck sitting around in a mockup of the Oval Office and saying inane things far beyond their bed times. Actually, BBC has some of the best coverage, even though it is tilted, the lead commentator, one Andrew Neil, tries to be mostly objective although he is surrounded by some bawling left wing loons. Some of the worst commentary comes from the “Republicans” the networks have as pundits: Steve Schmitt from McCain’s staff, Stuart Stevens (who ran Romney’s campaign), and a few outliers who are nasty but whom I was never acquainted. CNN at least had Jeffrey Lord on. It was also fun to watch the dour George Will sitting there stone faced and stone mouthed on Fox. All on Youtube.


27 posted on 02/10/2017 1:27:47 PM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson