[cgbg]

Never get between the “scientists” and cold hard cash.

They will turn you into road kill.

[G Larry]

It is FRAUD!!

Perpetrated with malice of forethought.

not “shoddy”.

“Shoddy” implies sloppy or accidental.

[ClearCase_guy]

Smith should now be able to get to the bottom of how the Karl study was conducted and who else helped move it along.

Soros

[GOPJ]

And in the most Obama-esque move, Bates said that the computer used to process the data “suffered a complete failure” and that none of the data had been archived or made available as required by NOAA rules, which means that Karl’s paper cannot be replicated or independently verified.

None of the data can be replicated?

LOL... Screaming - THIS IS NOT DEVOID OF THE CON... liberals are such lame liars.

[onedoug]

Is he a climatologist too? More power to him, but climatology is NOT a legitimate physical science. Way too many variables.

[JPJones]

“For now, Science magazine is standing by its publication of Karl’s study, claiming it underwent “rigorous peer review” and dismissing as “baseless and without merit” any notion that the study was rushed to coincide with the Paris conference.”

Science Mag is now covering-up.

What a disgrace.

[CyberAnt]

I saw this report on ONE TV station - FOX BUSINESS.

And, one radio program - Rush Limbaugh.

[M-cubed]

I proved that without a doubt the moon is made of green cheese....unfortunately I lost the data....But its settled science now anyway....

[indthkr]

Climate change fraud bump for later....

[Pride in the USA]

ping

[hal ogen]

It is not shoddy science it is intentionally fraudulent criminal science. These anti-scientists who produce this garbage should be arrested, charged and ruined. They are pathetic liars and scoundrels.

[Ditter]

Waaaaaaa! It's warming I can feel it, it's going to be 85 today in Houston, it is because I drive a Tahoe! sob~~~~~~

Snort//////S