Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier
No matter how inartful Trump's original statement about temporarily banning travel from Muslim countries was, the left was going to oppose him on this, no matter what.

Right. Actually they will try to oppose him on everything no matter what but what may be different here is Trump's original intent to "ban muslims" helps these judges feel sanctimonious and further justified in their minds in opposing a lawful EO. Banning muslims works for me but it would never pass legal muster and Trump ran as a law and order President. He could do a 'Jackson' and thumb his nose but why play that card so early?

Trump needs to get the SC justice installed and prevail in the SC ... or implement extreme vetting immediately which negates need for the ban ... or (as another Freeper suggested) just temporarily ban all immigration coming from all countries. Heck no discrimination there. Just shut it down. I sort of like the last option myself. Double down.

46 posted on 02/06/2017 7:59:14 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk
Banning muslims works for me but it would never pass legal muster

In fact, it does pass legal muster.

I think it's US Code 8 (I forget the section number) that gives the President the blanket authority to prohibit entry of any class or type of aliens, if he feels it is in the national interest to do so.

The power of the President under that law is broad, sweeping, and absolute.

47 posted on 02/06/2017 8:08:58 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson