Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/06/2017 8:08:54 AM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ColdOne

Trump should make an example of this clown!


2 posted on 02/06/2017 8:13:02 AM PST by gr8eman (The guys who picked last season's loser are already excited about next season's loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne
How to make the next four years easier for Trump?

ARREST SOROS AND FREEZE HIS ASSETS.

3 posted on 02/06/2017 8:14:29 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing (im)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

The judiciary should have virtually no role in immigration policy or policy implementation. None.


4 posted on 02/06/2017 8:14:57 AM PST by KyCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

Begs the question about what the “Most Partisan” 9th Circus will do when faced with these arguments this week for a full hearing.


5 posted on 02/06/2017 8:17:04 AM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne
From the article linked above, with my emphasis:

"But Washington State argued that it has an interest, as a state, in stopping the Trump order because "immigration is an important economic driver in Washington." The state's lawyers argued that Microsoft alone employs nearly 5,000 H-1B visa holders, and that is in addition to those working for Amazon, Expedia, and Starbucks in the state."

Irrespective of the fallacy of this as a legal argument, this is a serious problem that impacts the economic condition of Americans... not Washington State.

6 posted on 02/06/2017 8:24:38 AM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne
Duplicate threads are not good - try Search feature before posting: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3521775/posts
7 posted on 02/06/2017 8:25:45 AM PST by bobsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne
That's the trick with the "Temporary Order". It's only good for 14 days....and all he has to do is say..."I don't think that's right".

So now, he's pushing the envelope...

Do they really want it to go to the Supreme Court? While it is 4/4....maybe...and it looks like that is the plan.

It's just revenge for the USSC 4/4 decision upholding Obama's "do not deport" EO.

Except that is totally different...Obama is breaking the law in that call while Trump wishes to uphold the laws.

Inconvenient?? So what!

I do agree many of the agents decided to act on their own....Was Trump sabotaged??

8 posted on 02/06/2017 8:30:12 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

I have a former patient that arrested a Yemen national, who came over from a terrorist camp and he went to federal prison.This was in Virginia several years ago. So this judge is absent some facts.


12 posted on 02/06/2017 8:39:51 AM PST by born blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

I’m nearly certain this ‘judge’ was commissioned by David Brock, who is running his own extra-DNC war against DJT that the RATS can’t control or stop. They both wear bow ties, kinda have the same vibe, and I wonder if the ‘judge’ doesn’t have a blackmailable item being hung over his head by Brock.

The smarter ones of the Left realize this is doing more to push the ex-Dem voters closer to Trump, and the more they undermine our safety and rule of law, the more they assure they’ll never get those voters back.

Brock doesn’t think strategically, he just craves destruction. Hard to believe he used to be a ‘conservative Republican’.


13 posted on 02/06/2017 8:47:25 AM PST by txhurl (The LEFT are screaming at the Tsunami, and the Sky, trying to set fire to the Ocean- S.Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne

So Called Judge, hmmm seems accurate based on his lack of thought on this matter.


23 posted on 02/06/2017 9:28:30 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ColdOne
"Robart 'did not confront' the arguments against his position and indeed 'gave no explanation why the state of Washington has a 'high likelihood' of success on the merits of its claims."

Hmmm. . . . are judges in the fortune telling business now?

26 posted on 02/06/2017 12:08:43 PM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson