Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It’s no surprise the Democrats plan to fight Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch. There are no confirmation battles like Supreme Court confirmation battles because, as we always hear, such a decision can “shape the country for a generation.” But this doesn’t sound like the role envisioned by the founders. By Selwyn Duke
1 posted on 02/05/2017 10:04:05 AM PST by VitacoreVision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: VitacoreVision

It’s time to split up the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals


2 posted on 02/05/2017 10:09:10 AM PST by proudpapa (Trump Pence earned it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision

It is time to “repeal and replace” the 9th circuit.


3 posted on 02/05/2017 10:31:42 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision
Misguided solution:

This article promotes two ideas:


6 posted on 02/05/2017 10:44:38 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision

Pray.

If some of these people can only be removed by death or quitting, we need to pray that GOD would remove them however He sees fit.

Then Trump can install his own.


7 posted on 02/05/2017 10:51:23 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision
Congress could long before have

Most in Congress lacks cajones. Trent Lott, Bob Dole, Mitch McConnell, and also those who choose them... and also many Democrats.

They intentionally write laws that are vague, that they think are unConstitutional, that include words like reasonable which mean reasonable to the swing vote on the court.

Spineless Congress Critters yield their power to the other branches.

10 posted on 02/05/2017 10:56:48 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision

This doesn’t sound like the role envisioned by the founders.

No it isn’t. But it was begun by Leftists who have since admitted that their decision (Roe v Wade) had NO BASIS IN LAW but was the “right” thing to do none the less. It continues today.They’re playing CalvinBall and we are afraid of confronting this truth. If Trump doesn’t have a game plan to counter this then they have figured out how to beat him.


11 posted on 02/05/2017 10:59:26 AM PST by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision
“shape the country for a generation.” But this doesn’t sound like the role envisioned by the founders.

At the risk of being accused as a 'conspiracy theorist', consider the plans the dems MAY have had when they assassinated Scalia. The ONE good thing I can credit Mitchie McConnell with is NOT moving Garland's nomination through the senate.

14 posted on 02/05/2017 11:40:53 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Soros first political party quit collecting dues in 1945, now hes right at home as a marxist dem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision
Now we are finally getting to the heart of the matter. I don't think the judiciary really want to test this issue.

Ultimately, Congress will have to decide whether it supports the President upholding and executing its own legislative acts.

One can only imagine the constitutional crisis that would unfold if Congress attempted to impeach Trump over contempt of court resulting from an order that directly contradicts a law passed by Congress.

That's why Trump is going to win - he has logic and the law on his side.

15 posted on 02/05/2017 11:47:41 AM PST by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision

Very interesting article. Thanks for sharing. I hope the Trump team understands this fully. While it would ultimately be Congress that would have to start this process, Trump can obviously have a lot of influence on them.


17 posted on 02/05/2017 12:22:16 PM PST by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision
State attorney generals need to regard federal court opinions "voiding" a state law as binding only on the parties to the case, not as a legislative declaration of invalidity of a state law.

If the State attorney general believes, as shown by a written opinion, that the law is valid notwithstanding the court's opinion, then the State should continue to enforce the law.

Under the Constitution, Article I, section 1, "All legislative Powers herein granted" are vested in Congress, which means that NO legislative powers are vested in the Courts. Amending or repealing a law is a legislative function, which the federal courts may not properly do.

Support Justice Moore.

18 posted on 02/05/2017 12:57:45 PM PST by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision

The cowardice displayed by the U.S. Congress regarding the courts overreach and unconstitutional rulings is a trait shared by the states’ governors and legislatures. The latest act of cowardice was evidenced by lawmakers at all levels of government when they simply rolled over when the USSC declared the legality of same sex marriage. That unconstitutional declaration was allowed to override the laws and constitutions of several states. Of course the worst and most unconscionable and unconstitutional decision to come out of the USSC was Roe vs Wade. All legislative bodies in the country rolled on that one and they’ve been rolling ever since.


19 posted on 02/05/2017 12:59:29 PM PST by lakecumberlandvet (APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VitacoreVision

Blackmail them. They’re no angels.


26 posted on 02/05/2017 3:17:49 PM PST by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! And please, God, bless the USA again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson