Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus

If the Emancipation Proclamation applied to a “separate nation,” then there would be no constitutional grounds to oppose it.


82 posted on 02/04/2017 2:54:46 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Exactly. That is why it was necessary to post both the Union position and the Confederate position. Lincoln never accepted the “states in rebellion” as a separate nation.
In practice, every time Union troops gained control of an area in the Confederacy, any slaves that made it to Union lines were free. That was in direct opposition to federal law, the Fugitive Slave Clause, Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution and the Fugitive Slave Act which required return of runaway slaves to their masters.


87 posted on 02/04/2017 3:16:35 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson