Not sure how to take that.
Let me help you.
Mark my words: the Milo that everybody in conservatism is supposed to love now will prove to be the next David Brock.
Milo is certainly verbally talented and glib, but if you watched him on Tucker Carlson last night one comes away with the impression its all a lot stand up and its all about him.
He says he intends to influence Millenials. Influence for what? More acceptance of homosexualiztion of American society and trying to make it more normative - and now served up with a supposedly "conservative" moniker?
A guy that can't just shut up about his proclivities for reciprocally fudge packing black men is not a conservative spokesperson our side needs - regardless of whether a flamer like him can inspire leftists in Berkley to actually set things on fire.
Women are the most gullible for this kind of sh!t, and they often drag along their confused men -- not wanting to make waves or upset their own domestic tranquility -- into the eventual passive acceptance of it.
Real men don't care what a faggot does in his own "community." It's when he steps out of his community and yammers on about his "community" and his "conservatism" -- framed as it is by his proclivities -- to the normal community (as though we care) one comes away realizing in his mind it's all about him, not about conservatism.
What he purports to champion is able to stand on its own without all the faggotocracy he uses to prop up his points.
Faggots at their core live a life of self-deception about their biology and it pollutes everything else, as they feel almost irresistibly compelled to define everything they are and say by this self-deception.
I do not trust him.
FReegards!
