Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATE: JUDGE WEARS ‘P***Y HAT’ TO COURT, CITY ALLOWS IT
milo.yiannopoulos.net ^ | 2/1/17 | Milo Yiannopolis

Posted on 02/02/2017 3:20:48 AM PST by dontreadthis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: dontreadthis

Nope

If I was a lawyer for a white male defendant, no way would I let him be tried in that court


41 posted on 02/02/2017 5:45:58 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Austin, what do you expect.


42 posted on 02/02/2017 5:49:21 AM PST by 12th_Monkey (MAGA starting 1/20/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative

Every now wears a cowboy hats?


43 posted on 02/02/2017 5:55:30 AM PST by keving (We the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

The judge looks like Bob Newhart


44 posted on 02/02/2017 6:40:39 AM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Travis County amounts to nothing more than a boil on the back of the Great State of Texas.


45 posted on 02/02/2017 6:49:47 AM PST by RU88 (Bow to no man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

The hat is not the problem. The problem is the vast empty space beneath the hat.


46 posted on 02/02/2017 7:07:20 AM PST by lakecumberlandvet (APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

I suggest she has disqualified herself as a judge.
Putting forth a feminist political statement in court would seem to indicate a bias in favor of women over men.
Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct 4 complaints


47 posted on 02/02/2017 7:08:24 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Imagine that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct


48 posted on 02/02/2017 7:09:44 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Imagine that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

This libidiot holds no judicial powers. She is a judge in name only. She is just an overpaid county administrator for county commissioners.


49 posted on 02/02/2017 7:10:14 AM PST by TADSLOS (Reset Underway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: onyx

You are da winnah! Those people are California-styled nuts!


50 posted on 02/02/2017 8:57:55 AM PST by luvie (Elections have consequences.....bho. Yep...and WE won this one! HA! HA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Absolutely unethical. She should be censured if not recalled if not debarred. Maybe all three. It is a fundamental violation of judicial neutrality. We know the reaction if she’d worn a Trump hat or an NRA hat. But the media just find this to be kind of cute.


51 posted on 02/02/2017 9:02:51 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

If I am a male and she rules against me I would appeal it asap as she has clearly shown she is biased toward women and against men. What an idiot.


52 posted on 02/02/2017 11:29:48 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson