[BroJoeK]

bert: "If you have an interest, see post 43.
Unless you are totally ignorant and terminally biased..."

Thanks, I read Gould's book years ago, though I think it got lost in my last move.

Science is all about facts & theories to explain them.
Rules for theories include: they must be based on facts, they must explain the facts and they must be verifiable, or "falsifiable" is the term.
But first and foremost, they must be natural explanations.

Our science-denier FRiends here wish us to understand that science "so-called" is all about myths, religion and pseudo-science.
Science "so called" is just another religion, they say, and therefore their religious claims should take precedence.

Of course, that's far from true, but it's where the real arguments here take place.

Thanks for your posts!

[editor-surveyor]

.
>> “Science is all about facts & theories to explain them.” <<

And that is why this article, and “evolution” in general have no relation to science.

Humans have no ancestors that were not also humans.

That was made plain to all that actually read, in the principle of the “kinsman redeemer.”

Of course unbelievers will not accept this.

That is for Yehova to deal with.
.