Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier

“Theirs is not a righteous revolt against tyranny.”

I admit it may not be righteous. But in their minds it is: they want “state’s rights”. This is an admission on their part that being ruled by a far off Big Government is unjust.

Kind of what FR has been fighting for these past decades.

“It’s insurrection against the lawful demands of the federal government, who are merely enforcing the same laws that apply to every state in the union. “

Wow. That almost sounds like something one would read on DU or NYT.

In the big picture: sending less money to DC is a good thing, that all FReepers should support.


130 posted on 01/28/2017 4:25:48 PM PST by JPJones (George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: JPJones
I admit it may not be righteous. But in their minds it is: they want “state’s rights”. This is an admission on their part that being ruled by a far off Big Government is unjust.

BS. By being in the union, they've agreed to uphold federal laws, which apply equally to all the states. They're proposing a tax revolt, merely because some in that state have decided they don't want to uphold and abide by certain federal laws - mainly those having to do with harboring illegal aliens.

If they don't like those particular federal laws, then why haven't they attempted to get them changed through the legal process every state (including them) has agreed to? They have representatives in a duly convened Congress at the federal level. That's where they're supposed to push for change - as they agreed to, when they entered the federal union.

Essentially, they're saying, "We're not going to allow enforcement of federal immigration laws in our state, and if you withhold federal funds to compel our compliance, we'll just stop sending money to Washington." That's breaking two federal laws in one fell swoop.

Of course, they can file articles of secession, and try to break their political bonds with the United States. Until they've completed that process, they're still subject to the laws of the United States, and the federal government has every right to seek their compliance using every tool within their legal and constitutional jurisdiction.

Don't lose sight of what these numbskulls are proposing. It's not some noble rebellion against an overreaching, tyrannical government. It's not about resisting overly high taxation. It's about defying the current President and federal immigration law - nothing more.

172 posted on 01/28/2017 5:22:10 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson