Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Endorses Plan for 20% Tax on All Imports
New York Times ^ | JANUARY 26, 2017 | MICHAEL D. SHEAR

Posted on 01/26/2017 1:12:48 PM PST by reaganaut1

PHILADELPHIA — President Trump plans to make Mexico pay for his border wall by imposing a 20 percent tax on all imports into the United States from Mexico, raising billions of dollars that would cover the cost of the new barrier.

The proposal, which Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, said the president discussed privately with congressional Republicans before giving remarks at a party retreat here, would be a major new economic proposal that could have far-reaching implications for consumers, manufacturers and relations between the two governments.

Mr. Spicer said the 20 percent tax on annual Mexican imports would raise $10 billion a year and would easily pay for a border wall that is estimated to cost between $8 billion and $20 billion. The value of imported goods from Mexico in 2015 was $296 billion. Mr. Spicer said taxing imports is something that 160 other countries already do.

The new tax would be imposed on Mexico as part of a tax overhaul that Mr. Trump intends to pursue with the Republican Congress. Mr. Spicer said the tax initially would apply only to Mexico, but that the president supports imposing a 20 percent tax on all imports.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: first100days; mexico; nieto; nietotrip; tariffs; thirdworldhellhole; trump; trump45; trumpwall; trumpwalltax; winning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last
To: SeeSharp

It’s basically just a wealth transfer from American consumers to American producers


“Wealth Transfer” an interesting way of putting it.

So when I go shopping and buy something it is now “wealth transfer”?

Isn’t that also called “capitalism”?


121 posted on 01/27/2017 3:10:38 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

This would be Americans paying for the wall.


Don’t we already pay for everything now? Why should this be any different?

I want the border secured. Damn the cost. Whatever it turns out to be, it will be lower than what we will have to pay over the years by not doing it.


122 posted on 01/27/2017 3:16:28 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
Isn’t that also called “capitalism”?

The subject is taxation, and yes, it's a wealth transfer.

123 posted on 01/27/2017 3:20:05 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

This would be Americans paying for the wall.
**************************************************

Only if Americans buy the products. I don’t intend to buy any products from them.


124 posted on 01/27/2017 3:21:25 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson