Posted on 01/24/2017 10:37:58 AM PST by abb
A senior U.S. Secret Service agent posted Facebook condemnations of President Trump during the past seven months, including one in which she said she wouldn't want to "take a bullet" for him.
She explained herself saying she viewed his presidential candidacy as a "disaster" for the country, and especially for women and minorities.
Kerry O'Grady, the special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Denver district, oversees coordination with Washington-based advance teams for all presidential candidate and presidential trips to the area, including all upcoming or future trips by the president, vice president or Trump administration officials.
Despite her senior security role, she has made her disdain for Trump and his incoming administration clear to her Facebook followers, who included current and former Secret Service agents and other people who were employees at the time of the posts. O'Grady's posts triggered at least one complaint to the office that oversees investigations into Secret Service misbehavior, two knowledgeable sources told the Washington Examiner.
Subscribe today to get intelligence and analysis on defense and national security issues in your Inbox each weekday morning from veteran journalists Jamie McIntyre and Jacqueline Klimas.
In one Facebook post O'Grady wrote at 11:07 p.m. on a Sunday in October, she endorsed Clinton and said she would endure "jail time" rather than "taking a bullet" for what she regarded as a "disaster" for America.
The post didn't mention Trump by name but clearly referred to him.
In the same post, she mentioned the Hatch Act, which bars executive branch staff, except the president, vice president and some other senior executive officials, from engaging in certain political activities.
"As a public servant for nearly 23 years, I struggle not to violate the Hatch Act. So I keep quiet and skirt the median," she wrote. "To do otherwise can be a criminal offense for those in my position. Despite the fact that I am expected to take a bullet for both sides.
"But this world has changed and I have changed. And I would take jail time over a bullet or an endorsement for what I believe to be disaster to this country and the strong and amazing women and minorities who reside here. Hatch Act be damned. I am with Her."
Secret Service employees are among those federal employees subject to enhanced Hatch Act restrictions, including these two rules:
May not post a comment to a blog or a social media site that advocates for or against a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group. May not use any e-mail account or social media to distribute, send or forward content that advocates for or against a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group.
Asked for comment, the U.S. Secret Service responded: "The USSS is aware of the postings and we are looking into the matter."
In a lengthy interview with the Examiner Monday, O'Grady says she took down the post after two to three days of greater reflection and wasn't trying to imply she wouldn't take a bullet for Trump or any officials in the Trump administration.
"It was an internal struggle for me but as soon as I put it up, I thought it was not the sentiment that I needed to share because I care very deeply about the mission," she said.
O'Grady repeatedly stressed that she would in no way shirk her duties to protect the president because of her opposition to Trump's candidacy and support for Clinton.
"No, not at all. I firmly believe in this job. I'm proud to do it and we serve the office of the President," she said.
At the time of the posting, she said she was reacting to news about Trump sexually assaulting women. O'Grady's Facebook post came in the wake of the release of a video in which Trump and Access Hollywood host Billy Bush engaged in a lewd conversation about women and Trump bragged about being able to grab women by their genitals.
O'Grady said she had experienced sexual assault in college and "there was a very emotional reaction to what was said."
"But I recognize that the agency is the most important thing to me. My government is the most important thing to me," she said. "I serve at the pleasure of the president, but I still have the first amendment right to say things."
O'Grady's negative stance regarding Trump did not end when he became president.
O'Grady posted the logo for the women's March on Denver as her Facebook cover backdrop on Inauguration Day, Friday, Jan. 21 at 12:25 p.m.
When one of her Facebook followers commented that "none of these women represent me #justsayin," O'Grady countered that "all of these women represent me! Proud to say it! #nasty." That back and forth, captured in a screengrab of the post, no longer appears on O'Grady's Facebook page.
Women anti-Trump activists have taken on the label of "nasty woman" to demonstrate their opposition to him. The phrase is a reference to Trump's remark calling Clinton "such a nasty woman" in the final moments of the presidential debate in late October.
At 11:23 p.m. on Inauguration Day, she updated her profile picture to an artist's rendering of Princess Leia with the words, "A woman's place is in the resistance."
"The resistance," with its allusion to the rebels in the "Star Wars" movies, has become a moniker for those opposing Trump's presidency.
Those posts remained on O'Grady's Facebook page as of Monday afternoon. She took the posts down after her interview with the Examiner and replaced them with a backdrop of a snowy scene and a smiling photo of herself sporting ski gear.
The DHS OIG received a complaint about O'Grady's Facebook posts on Oct. 11, a source said.
It's unclear whether the Secret Service explicitly bans agents and other employees from engaging in political speech on social media or has written rules prohibiting it.
But in operational security training, instructors have long warned agents or would-be agents against the use of social media because it can make them vulnerable to threats by exposing their personal information and their movements, according to two knowledgeable sources.
In another pre-election post that no longer appears on her Facebook page, O'Grady shares a Huffington Post story with the headline: "Scott Baio Defends Trump's Sexism with More Sexism." She accompanies her Facebook post of the story with the words: "One word: douche. How do you like them apples?!"
In a post in late November, O'Grady shared Facebook remarks from the liberal news outlet Vox, which carried a photo of Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., and a story with the headline, "Donald Trump nominates Jeff Sessions to serve as attorney general." The Vox Facebook post commented, "Just a few years ago, this would have been unimaginable."
O'Grady added her own comment on the post: "We are moving our civil rights into a period of bigotry, misogyny and racism that this country has not tolerated for decades. Dark ages. I am horrified and dismayed beyond words."
O'Grady appears to have removed the pre-election posts after fellow and former Secret Service agents complained to her supervisors and the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General, which investigates agency complaints of misbehavior, according to two sources familiar with the timing of the posts' removal.
At publishing time, O'Grady released the following statement:
"I serve this country with pride and I proudly diligently and fiercely protect and support the institutions and pillars of our republic established by the very same document that allows my free expression. I do so with every fiber of my being for the very reason that those institutions are in place to guarantee my right and the rights of all our citizens to voice and express our opinions and beliefs even when and especially when those values may be contrary to those of the party in power. My devotion to mission and country is only strengthened by the fact that the founders recognize the value of dissent and the freedom to assemble and voice those opposing convictions.
"They enshrine those rights for future generations so we avoid the path of authoritarian regimes that shackle their people with fear."
In response to whether her expression of her opposition to Trump would affect her ability to do her job, she said:
"I hope you understand that's an emphatic no and I need to make sure that's resoundingly clear and just reinforces that this job needs to done well."
She needs to be fired. and all other agents who are on her FB. This should have been reported by the other agents as soon as it was known!! Fire them and prosecute them in any way possible!!
Perfect, a future Wal-Mart security guard, highly trained at the taxpayers expense.
Reassignment is not adequate here. Her employment needs to be terminated.
SS screening process needs tightening.
She might, and I repeat, MIGHT, qualify as a security “monitor”! :-) But surely not a security guard.
hope her new p* hat keeps her warm on the corner begging for handouts
Regards,
GtG
And, poor judgement too.
“I do not think termination is warranted here.”
I agree. I think they need to use the Holman Rule to reduce her salary to $1 per year and let her quit - no benefit payments required. Item (3) below (from Wikipedia):
The Holman Rule is a rule in the United States House of Representatives that allows amendments to appropriations legislation that would reduce the salary of or eliminate specific federal employees, or cut a specific program. The rule was first enacted in 1876 and rescinded in 1983, and was reinstated in January 2017 on a temporary basis.
The 2017 reinstatement of the law was a standing order not incorporated into the main body of the Rules of the House. It allows during the first session of the 115th Congress, “any provision or amendment... that retrenches expenditures by—(1) the reduction of amounts of money in the bill; (2) the reduction of the number and salary of the officers of the United States; or (3) the reduction of the compensation of any person paid out of the Treasury of the United States
This is also a reason why women shouldn't be allowed to be in the Secret Service or the military and am beginning to believe, many other fields too.
Yes, some men are also mental cases/unstable, but there appears to be far more females, that are like this one, in today's era.
I have been trying to contact SS all day-their site is down. I did tweet this to Trump and his inner circle.
This scares the heck out of me. These lunatics need to be removed from being anywhere near our President.
OGrady soon to be pursuing new challenges elsewhere.
Exactly. Unbelievable that these agents haven't been fired yet. This is beyond outrageous.
It’s on the front page of Drudge. I think they’ve seen it. Hope we read a follow up tomorrow that she lost her job.
Love your idea :-)
NO, NO, and NO !!!
"Security risk?"......
YES, YES, and YES !!!
Leni
Fire her. Her pasture awaits.
Get that one as far away as possible from Trump!!! She should be fired immediately! It’s in her job requirements to defend ANY President. Get the arrogant bitch out!!!
She needs to be fired. She didnt think Trump would win ..too bad.
Time to lose your job. You can’t be trusted to protect and serve POTUS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
you could be right about trump surprise election.
from the way her facebook posts read, it looked like she was applying for a promotion with USSS in the new Hildabeast administration.
she does sound like the nasty woman she claims to be, tho.
Maybe she can get a job walking Obam’s dog
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.