If he can convey his point, which he does, and his point is good, which it is, I think that criticizing the semantics only serves to distract from the main point.
I’m grateful somebody in his position has the chops to speak out against injustice even if his manner of expressing it is not the platonic ideal.
Im grateful somebody in his position has the chops to speak out against injustice even if his manner of expressing it is not the platonic ideal. <<
Exactly....Hes gonna get enough shit from his thug “brothers” as it is.....
Yes
even if his manner of expressing it is not the platonic ideal.
but platonic ideals exist so we can virtue signal and create talking points with no substance...