We need PROOF from an irrefutable source. I'd hope that with over 200 in custody, and the seriousness of attempting to thwart the peaceful transfer of power, some proof that these are paid Anarchists will be forthcoming.
When that happens, guys will begin telling their clueless wives and daughters to stay away from the protests.
Washington Times reported this.
“We need PROOF from an irrefutable source. I’d hope that with over 200 in custody, and the seriousness of attempting to thwart the peaceful transfer of power, some proof that these are paid Anarchists will be forthcoming.”
There are severe problems with locking people up. It doesn’t deter crime, it is finishing school for criminals. (There is a special facility near me that prisoners get transferred to so they can get training and education to transition back into society. A guard there told me three of them in the last year have committed murder within 24 hours of release.) It is expensive, costing more per year per prisoner to than a year at Harvard. There simply isn’t enough room, which is one reason the courts are anxious to plea-bargain to lower charges.
The way I see it, the paid soldiers on the ground should be encouraged to give up the payer. We are going to find that those paying are the SEIU, other unions and ultimately Democratic party connected machinery. This should be a RICO case. Those people at the top, Nancy Pelosi, George Soros, should be the ones we spend money on in prison.
Up to this point the payers have had political cover. That may have gone away on January 20. We shall have to wait and see. Our justice system tends to look at, for example. the drug user on the street and ignore the people supplying at the top. The people at the top are really tough targets and most of the mechanisms for dealing with, in this example, drugs, are tailored for small, easy targets. The situation is similar when you have huge liberal organizations who are, essentially, a reprise of the Brown Shirts but in purple or even long sleeves and ties.