Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Future Snake Eater

I am not disputing your reasoning. Again my point is, if POTUS wants to protect American lives, do not invade a country like Saddm’s Iraq which did not threaten attacking United States of America, and did not even have the means to deliver his puny chemical WMD’s to US soil.

On the other hand N. Korea is headed by a crazy man who has openly said he will attack United States with nukes, unless we give in to his demands. And NK already has nukes and testing ICBM’s.


58 posted on 01/16/2017 7:22:35 PM PST by entropy12 (Trump...first president who does not fear and kowtow to media in 100+ years..amazing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: entropy12
On the other hand N. Korea is headed by a crazy man who has openly said he will attack United States with nukes, unless we give in to his demands.

Not terribly likely. The greater strategic threat from NK is selling WMDs to other nations and/or terrorist organizations. I would argue that's far more dangerous than being a direct threat as a nation. It's relatively easy to keep one nation contained. It's very difficult to halt numerous state and non-state entities in the same way.

71 posted on 01/17/2017 10:22:10 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson