Skip to comments.
How an Unverified but Explosive Dossier Became a Crisis for Donald Trump (NY Slimes doubles-down)
The New York Slimes ^
| January 11, 2017
| Scott Shane, Nicholas Confessore and Matthew Rosenberg
Posted on 01/11/2017 7:44:24 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: ptsal
Control-LEFT Media I can't wait for the "Delete-Left Media."
41
posted on
01/11/2017 8:24:50 PM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
To: P-Marlowe
Good observation. The EPA said it is. Illegal to fill rat holes with dry ice. 😀
42
posted on
01/11/2017 8:28:33 PM PST
by
ptsal
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Classic fake news.
State of the art modus operandi for presenting fake news.
Press knows so-called dossier is unverifiable (i.e. fake) so don’t publish it.
Later, a weak news click-bait site on a downward spiral finally publishes it.
So-claimed legitimate news then reports on the “controversy”.
43
posted on
01/11/2017 8:29:00 PM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Unbelievable. They are still in denial.
Maybe some of them are, but the NYT knows their audience. Their audience wants to read crap like this. They don't care if it's not true, they just need it to conform to their view of Trump.
44
posted on
01/11/2017 8:36:53 PM PST
by
Girlene
To: tennmountainman
His clients supposedly included both Democrats and anti-Trump Republicans.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Parts of the story remain out of reach most critically the basic question of how much, if anything, in the dossier New York Times is true. There, fixed it.
46
posted on
01/11/2017 8:39:13 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
( Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Vendome
I was also wondering why Mr. Steele has not come forward to address reports about his role in this report. I assume he is a safe house somewhere.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
From Walter Duranty to Jason Blair, now to Donald Trump, the NYTimes demonstrates again, it has perfected the art of fake news.
48
posted on
01/11/2017 8:44:40 PM PST
by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: Stayfree
What is he doing with drawers between his legs?
49
posted on
01/11/2017 8:45:45 PM PST
by
arthurus
>> Scott Shane, Nicholas Confessore and Matthew Rosenberg
How ‘bout giving these 3 participants an award!
50
posted on
01/11/2017 8:50:11 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: tennmountainman
It’s not complicated: Opposition Research is done by the Opposition. HILLARY
51
posted on
01/11/2017 8:50:45 PM PST
by
heights
To: riverdawg
52
posted on
01/11/2017 8:55:58 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
To: tennmountainman
How about Hellary and Soros
53
posted on
01/11/2017 9:00:06 PM PST
by
crazycat
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Old and Busted: Fake but Accurate.
The New Hotness: Unverified but Explosive
54
posted on
01/11/2017 9:01:13 PM PST
by
Harpo Speaks
(Honk! Honk! Honk! Either it's foggy out, or make that a dozen hard boiled eggs.)
To: crazycat
55
posted on
01/11/2017 9:09:12 PM PST
by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
To: Texas Eagle
56
posted on
01/11/2017 9:12:08 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Agree on all points.
Best transition ever!
57
posted on
01/11/2017 9:19:23 PM PST
by
Ken H
(Best election ever!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
respected former British spy named Christopher Steele
So we are at a crossroad 4chan states a member created this as a hoax.
The media is now going with a “respected former British spy named Christopher Steele” as the source
My money is there is no such person but let here from him if he exists...if
If “respected former British spy named Christopher Steele” is a press fabrication all hell’s going to break loose.
58
posted on
01/11/2017 9:45:54 PM PST
by
tophat9000
(Tophat9000)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“The consequences have been incalculable and will play out long past Inauguration Day.”
Uh, in 109 days I PROMISE you, NYT, that EVERYONE will have completely forgotten this nonsense.
“It has further undermined his relationship with the intelligence agencies “
Not really. All those traitorous political hacks will have been fired and some imprisoned within 109 days, and competent professionals will have replaced them.
“and cast a shadow over the new administration.”
which of course is the whole point of the massive river of fake news emanating from NYT, WaPo and CNN. In fact, pretty much at least once a day each of those outlets has declared Donald Trump’s Presidency irredeemably destroyed.
59
posted on
01/11/2017 9:47:59 PM PST
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I remember that! They’ve tried all this before; and it eventually backfired on them. But they’ll keep on trying until it sticks!
60
posted on
01/11/2017 10:02:35 PM PST
by
dsutah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson