Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christopher Steele, Ex-British Intelligence Officer, Said to Have Prepared Dossier on Trump
WSJ ^

Posted on 01/11/2017 11:37:46 AM PST by TigerClaws

A former British intelligence officer now working for a private security-and-investigations firm produced the dossier of unverified allegations about President-elect Donald Trump’s activities and connections in Russia, people familiar with the matter say.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: christophersteele; dossier; fusiongps; steele; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: DiogenesLamp
Will point this out again. Why does a "British" guy, refer to the "World Soccer Tournament"?

The do not. It is called the world cup and they never say soccer. They say football.

This leads me to believe this was written by an American and not a Brit!

41 posted on 01/11/2017 12:05:56 PM PST by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Wall Street Journal News section is liberal. Editorial section is conservative. Except on illegal immigration.


42 posted on 01/11/2017 12:06:23 PM PST by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

If they dig deep enough they will find Kristol, Rubio, McCain, David Brock and others under this rock.

There was fast collaboration between the radical left/Democrats and the neocons on this. But then I repeat myself:)

And it was all a fabrication.


43 posted on 01/11/2017 12:07:30 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

Precisely. This is the type of stuff found in the infamous FBI background files that mysteriously made their way to the Clinton White House after the 1992 election. Unsubstantiated material, from sources that were never properly vetted. About what you’d expect as op research info, but if the intel chiefs actually “offered” this stuff to Trump as an example of disinformation or a potential blackmail file, they should be fired immediately.

Sincerely hope Trump has legal remedies for this. BuzzFeed needs to join Gawker on the ash heap of media history. As for the intel folks, Clapper has already submitted his resignation; Trump needs to fire Comey and Brennan on inauguration day. Brennan’s heading out the door as well, but he needs to officially terminated as a little asterisk on his career.

Hard to believe, but the spooks and media types still don’t know who they’re dealing with. Lot of heads are going to be rolling, beginning on 20 January.


44 posted on 01/11/2017 12:10:55 PM PST by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
The whole thing. It was fiction on 4chan. It was turned into a ‘dossier’ and sent to Rick Warren (a never Trumper).

Rick got it to McCain who got it to the FBI/CIA. They (possibly) leaked it to the media. It’s been circulating for quite some time now (months).

And remember how pretty much this entire group of people pooh poohed questions about Obama's birth? Yet they swallow this load of clap trap hook line and sinker?

45 posted on 01/11/2017 12:11:36 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

If anyone has read the stuff in that so-called “Dossier” its so retarded even a guileless libtard praying it was true would find it beyond absurd and unbelievable. It was 4chan.


46 posted on 01/11/2017 12:12:21 PM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I know I shouldn’t laugh, this is serious, but...yes. You can imagine THEY are having a good laugh over at 4chan.


47 posted on 01/11/2017 12:12:31 PM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Yes! You cracked it!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gV1sxB8TxI


48 posted on 01/11/2017 12:14:53 PM PST by t4texas (No koolaid for me. Thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

“....Rick Warren (a never Trumper).

Rick got it to McCain...”

There was a middleman:

...Rick Wilson (a never Trumper).

Rick got it to McMullin (vote-stealer)

McMullin got it to McCain.


49 posted on 01/11/2017 12:15:57 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: t4texas

I always get my man!


50 posted on 01/11/2017 12:18:23 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

If true, this fool can be sued for defamation in Britain, and would lose. But not sure if Trump could do that or any other “aggrieved” party.


51 posted on 01/11/2017 12:19:23 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

The idea that a billionaire would hire someone to urinate on a bed THAT WAS ONCE USED BY O’BAMA is so ludicrous it could only have been hoaxed by a teenager. And as you say, only a guileless libtard would believe it.


52 posted on 01/11/2017 12:20:24 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Hey wait! If Trump has property or business holdings in Britain, Trump may be able to sue for defamation, and win big.


53 posted on 01/11/2017 12:21:42 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
4 channel trolling the mediots, CIA, Rats, Intel Idiots, and McAnal.


54 posted on 01/11/2017 12:26:56 PM PST by Grampa Dave (The deadliest Islamic terror cell America has ever faced is leaving office, 20 Jan 2017!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

I don’t understand why people keep putting wsj articles on here either. I have no interest in subscribing so I never get to read the full article.


55 posted on 01/11/2017 12:27:17 PM PST by EweFunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Heh heh . . .


56 posted on 01/11/2017 12:29:57 PM PST by t4texas (No koolaid for me. Thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Thanks


57 posted on 01/11/2017 12:30:18 PM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I talked to a resource who knows 4chan. He says the admins are all SJWs. The libertarians bailed and started something called 8chan.
Don’t know when the SJWs invaded 4chan and took over or if they had any hand to play.


58 posted on 01/11/2017 12:31:05 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I cancelled my WSJ subscription about 10 years ago.

Their bs polling and anti Trump articles during last year’s primaries and general election showed how deep the WSJ was into fake news to elect and abet Criminal Clintoon.

Anyone subscribing to WSJ needs to have themselves declared incompetent and unable to care for themselves. They due to their incompetence could be dangerous to those around them.

WSJ is another example of the elite NE Ivy telling us what to do and believe.


59 posted on 01/11/2017 12:33:06 PM PST by Grampa Dave (The deadliest Islamic terror cell America has ever faced is leaving office, 20 Jan 2017!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

if you copy the title of the article, then paste it into google, you’ll get in - open the third one down which has an excerpt showing.- smiley face.


60 posted on 01/11/2017 12:34:40 PM PST by true believer forever (Fight the Attacks against Trump: PLANT YOUR FEET, LEAN INTO IT, BEAT IT BACK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson