Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Time to Rein in Regulators
Townhall.com ^ | December 31, 2016 | Phil Kerpen

Posted on 12/31/2016 8:43:27 AM PST by Kaslin

I've written a book chapter and a lot of columns over the years on the Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act ---- a profoundly simple, powerful bill that would require regulators and bureaucrats to get their most expensive rules approved by Congress before they could take effect ---- and we've never been closer to seeing it signed into law.

The House is planning to take it up as one of the first orders of business in the new 115th Congress, and it is expected to pass, as it has in the House each of the last three Congresses.Each previous Congress it passed the House under a veto threat from President Obama, who was adamantly opposed to any of his regulatory handiwork being scrutinized by our elected officials.

Times have changed.

"I will sign the REINS Act should it reach my desk as President and more importantly I will work hard to get it passed," Donald Trump said in a statement his campaign provided me last year. "The monstrosity that is the Federal Government with its pages and pages of rules and regulations has been a disaster for the American economy and job growth. The REINS Act is one major step toward getting our government under control."

It took a while to get to this point. The REINS Act started as an idea in the head of a remarkable 78-year-old tea party activist in Alexandria, Kentucky named Lloyd Rogers.

In 2009, Rogers went to meet with his then-congressman Geoff Davis at a town hall meeting. Both were outraged about an EPA storm water management consent decree that cost the three northern Kentucky counties in a consolidated sewer district about a billion dollars, doubling water fees.

He handed Davis a piece of paper that quoted Article I, Section 1 of the United States Constitution:"All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives."

The paper also had a simple legislative proposal: "All rules, regulations, or mandates that require citizens, state or local government financial expenditures must first be approved by the U.S. Congress before they can become effective."

Davis took the idea back to Washington and huddled with his key advisers to develop the simple idea into a robust, workable piece of legislation. That idea became the REINS Act, and was made a part of the official Pledge to America document on which Republicans won control of the House in 2010.

The REINS Act cuts to the heart of abuse of regulatory power by requiring any major regulatory action to pass the House and Senate and be signed by the president (or have a veto-override), before it can take effect. It seems obvious. The best ideas always do.

The REINS Act's first Senate sponsor was Jim DeMint, but when he retired it was fittingly taken up by Rand Paul, on whose campaign Rogers was a tireless volunteer.When Geoff Davis retired, the bill's lead sponsorship was taken over in the House by Indiana's Todd Young.This time around Doug Collins of Georgia is leading the charge in the House, while Paul and Young (newly promoted by the voters of Indiana) together lead the fight in the Senate under Mitch McConnell ---- a Kentuckian like Rogers, Davis, and Paul.

That Senate vote will be difficult, as many Democrats ---- aghast though they might be at the regulations and deregulations to come from Trump appointees in the federal bureaucracy ---- understand thatlack of accountability is a great long-term advantage for their big government ideology.But ten Democrats running for reelection in 2018 are sitting in states that voted for Trump, and they may have a difficult time explaining to voters why they should re-elect someone unwilling to even vote on major regulations.And the House making it a top priority will build strong momentum for the Senate fight.

As we work to restore the U.S. Constitution, there is no better place to start than at the beginning, with Article I, Section 1. Thanks to Lloyd Rogers, a Republican Congress, and Donald Trump, we may be poised to do just that.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: house; regulations; senate; trump

1 posted on 12/31/2016 8:43:27 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The REINS Act...

They probably could have gotten it past Obama if they had allowed auto correct to fix the title, turning it into the PENIS Act.

2 posted on 12/31/2016 8:48:26 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

It is a good start toward reining in the regulatory state.


3 posted on 12/31/2016 8:50:14 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The executive branch was never supposed to have power to regulate a single thing; it’s unconstitutional. Any regulatory power was given to Congress alone in the Constitution, and it is strictly limited.


4 posted on 12/31/2016 8:51:00 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s time for school boards to take back their districts. They have been held hostage to State and Federal mandates that have forced schools to adopt ridiculous programs and curricula. I hope the Trump administration reads these posts. I just subbed the other day for the first time. . .the textbooks are something else. You have to go around the block more than once to begin to solve the math problems.


5 posted on 12/31/2016 8:51:12 AM PST by Maudeen (No one on this earth is too far gone for Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

It’s past time to end the Federal Dept of Education...Control back to individual states and districts...


6 posted on 12/31/2016 8:55:09 AM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

That happened because most people are clueless about the purpose of their local school board. They are there to represent the taxpayer.

Where I live most people vote for board members if they are professional educators. They think that makes sense.

On the surface it does, but it is like letting the Fox guard the henhouse.


7 posted on 12/31/2016 9:02:47 AM PST by bankwalker (groupthink is dangerous ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Drain the swamp, so to speak.


8 posted on 12/31/2016 9:03:41 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
When I was in college years ago I had to stop one morning for gas. I was at the register and while waiting to pay someone was complaining about the "new law" requiring that anyone looking younger than thirty and to provide ID for cigarettes.

"No, you're wrong," said the grizzly-bearded man behind the register. "You think it's a law and everyone else thinks it's a law. But it's NOT a law. It's a regulation. A law is something passed by representatives that you and I vote for and are accountable to us. A regulation is created by bureaucrats you'll NEVER see, you will never know who they are and you and I can't fire them. They do whatever the hell they want."

I've never forgotten that.

9 posted on 12/31/2016 9:08:06 AM PST by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Time to fire 50% of the regulators with extreme prejudice. Then put the next 25% the will be terminated at the ens of the year. In the meantime they can rescind obsolete and punitive regulations on the books.
10 posted on 12/31/2016 9:12:18 AM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Regulations are written by people who have law degrees ...and no clients.


11 posted on 12/31/2016 9:14:12 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We need to rein in regulators.

Obama and crew see it as “Regulators Reign!”


12 posted on 12/31/2016 9:15:26 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Now THIS is more like it!


13 posted on 12/31/2016 9:25:03 AM PST by SE Mom (Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It sounds good but it’s really just nibbling around the edges. Forget the scalpel, use the ax. Entire departments need to be abolished.


14 posted on 12/31/2016 9:27:50 AM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

As they say in Europe; Letting the goat be the gardener...


15 posted on 12/31/2016 9:33:11 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

Based on some of his statements, it wouldn’t surprise me if Trump isn’t a closet FReeper.


16 posted on 12/31/2016 9:40:28 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Freedom Trumps Fascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Expose the reg agencies to litigation. Loser pays. If the reg agency loses, they not only pay that amount, but they lose that amount permanently from their budget every year after that.


17 posted on 12/31/2016 9:42:30 AM PST by lurk (TEat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Add:
“”All rules, regulations, or mandates that require citizens, state or local government financial expenditures must first be approved by the U.S. Congress before they can become effective...AND ALL members of the U. S. Congress and other members of the Government shall be equally subject to and bound by any rules, regulations or mandates required of citizens.”

ObamaCare, for one would never have even been brought up for vote - And such members would never have been able to make themselves multi-millionaires by circumventing the ‘Insider Trading” laws that would put you or I in Jail -

As well as, by some means: “Elected members of U. S. Government shall not have the power to set themselves raises”


18 posted on 12/31/2016 3:30:44 PM PST by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson