To: Lonesome in Massachussets; Tucker39; Steely Tom
Now, we have something to talk about! Thankfully, they displayed the waveform early in the video -- so I screen-grabbed it, did a little color annotation, and "parked" it up on my webdomain for us to all see:
It
"is" "fast" or "brief" -- just a "spike" pulse >400 ms in duration -- (amplitude modulated, if you will...) And descending in frequency some 0.3 GHz during that time...
I would call it both amplitude and frequency modulated...
~~~~~~~~~~
Well, there you have it, folks -- have at it! '-)
32 posted on
12/29/2016 10:16:13 AM PST by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias. "Barack": Allah's current ally. "Comey" Barack's current toadie...)
To: TXnMA; Yo-Yo; spodefly; Da Coyote; pfflier; tet68; ProtectOurFreedom; mrsmith; Tucker39; ...
That the frequency-vs-time relationship is a curve would seem to indicate that the phenomenon is due to physics, not an attempt to communicate information from a distant civilization.
If the f/t relationship had been dead linear, a perfect straight line, I'd be much more inclined to give a big "Hmm!"
39 posted on
12/29/2016 12:07:24 PM PST by
Steely Tom
([VOTE FRAUD] == [CIVIL WAR])
To: TXnMA
I would call it both amplitude and frequency modulated. What inference do you draw from that?
49 posted on
12/29/2016 8:54:37 PM PST by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson