And they did it the day they lost the power to enforce it too.
Sweet serendipity!
There’s nothing that can be written into law that can’t be unwritten out of law.
It would look like something that the USSC could knock down, even if not repealed.
A cornerstone US constitutional philosophy is that, generally, good speech may be expected to vanquish bad speech — with some tightly constrained exceptions such as libel and slander. It was early held in the courts that sedition didn’t qualify — it could be countered by patriotic messages. Raising up the devil never has as much power as raising up God. However this principle is sorely tested when few people are truly interested in raising up God.
Like it or not, America has a theological background. Its constitution, while not perfectly formulated, was intended to stand against such a background. Good is stronger than evil, and speech is a means of raising the power of either.
All “Law” that is antithetical to the Constitution is “null and void”.
You can’t make unjust “law” in our Justice system (although the Marxists have done it over and over since 1913 to destroy private property rights, and all the amendments and to make us all into Slaves for the State.) BUT it is ALL still unconstitutional and we need good judges to declare it so.
We need to refuse to obey unjust, evil “law” (read tagline).
Nuremberg stated that same-—that officers, judges, people have to refuse to follow evil (unjust-unconstitutional) “law”.
Totalitarianism happens when good men do nothing.