Posted on 12/25/2016 6:18:39 AM PST by ducttape45
The US publicly told its partners on the Security Council that it would consider each draft resolution on its merit, but says that it never indicated how it would vote– up until the vote itself.
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration insists it was disciplined in its silence over how it would ultimately vote on resolutions related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that ultimately reached the UN Security Council, where it holds veto power.
Hours before such a vote was set to take place– on a resolution condemning Israel's settlement activity– one senior administration official told The Jerusalem Post that the president's team "was not involved in formulating the resolution, nor have we promoted it."
"We have not communicated to any UN Security Council members how the United States would vote if the resolution comes before the UN Security Council," the official said.
But the Israeli government has publicly accused the Obama administration of "colluding" with its drafters to ensure that the right resolution with just the right language came forward for a vote. The US publicly told its partners on the Security Council that it would consider each draft resolution on its merit, but says that it never indicated how it would vote– up until the vote itself, which took place on Friday afternoon. The US abstained, allowing the resolution to pass.
The Israeli government provided no clear evidence to back its claim that the Obama administration worked to promote the effort. But one public engagement by Secretary of State John Kerry last month may offer some clues as to how Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government reached its conclusion. (Israel, Palestinian ambassadors to UN give speeches before vote on settlement resolution)
Kerry visited New Zealand on November 13, shortly after the US presidential election, and took part in "deep" conversation over how its government– which holds a non-permanent seat on the Security Council until the end of this calendar year– could engage in a UN-related initiative on the Middle East peace process.
"It is a conversation we are engaged in deeply and we've spent some time talking to Secretary Kerry about where the US might go on this," New Zealand's foreign minister, Murray McCully, told local reporters after the meeting, according to the New Zealand Herald. "It is something that is still in play."
"I think there are some very important decisions that the Obama administration is going to have to make in its lame-duck period on this issue," he added.
Egypt drafted the resolution that ultimately condemned Israel's settlement enterprise as an illegal operation contrary to the pursuit of peace with the Palestinians. The resolution also condemned incitement to violence by the Palestinian authorities.
The Egyptians coordinated on the language with the Palestinian Authority, whose chief negotiator, Saeb Erekat, met with Kerry at the State Department on December 12. Israeli officials believe it was at this meeting that Kerry first relayed the president's willingness to abstain.
The White House said on Friday that US President Barack Obama had not decided how to proceed until hours before the vote.
Last minute, however, the Egyptian government pulled its own draft– due to pressure from the Israeli government, according to Western diplomatic sources, and after President-elect Donald Trump called publicly and privately for the resolution to be scrapped.
The draft was then dusted off by New Zealand, which formally introduced the resolution for a vote.
Isreal should explode a test nuke...then demand a permanent seat in the UN security council...rules or no rules!
I don't see Kerry hating Israel, per se, but rather is totally self-loving and is in desperate search for his Nobel. I am sure he is astonished the Iran "deal" did not lock him in. He likely sees this as the adder that will be the icing on the cake.
Kerry is an appeaser, plain and simple. The Process is his lodestone as it appears to be for the entire Department of State. Israel's objections to being whittled down piece by piece are simply seen as irritants, stopping the formulaic process of crafting an agreement where one side gives up a real concession while the other balances it with an empty promise. On paper it sounds great and is considered a win but in reality that promise is never kept. Ever. History is replete with examples, with Neville Chamberlain serving as the poster boy.
Kerry does not understand that he stands in a long line of failed negotiators, ones who have "stood up" to Napoleon and Hitler, to name a few. Kerry is a vainglorious buffoon, to quote Mark Steyn.
For pragmatic reasons? Heck he gave Iran how much?
Well, the other poster said that 40 billion was to keep them happy.
Not at all. I don't question their loyalty to Israel.
What spirit is leading you, even on Christmas day, to post antisemitic comments ? Are you religious ? Are you progressive ?
If we send any foreign aid to NZ, end it.
Kerry’s daughter is married to an Iranian.
Does that influence his opinions?
“maybe next time Israel should get nothing”
Well, at least you are not trolling the Ayn Rand thread anymore. The nonsense about her being a satanist was getting annoying.
Ugly satanic hag was what I said. Try to be accurate.
Obama’s national security advisor is an Iranian. Did that influence his opinion?
You are making an analogy between a foreign country, and Christ.
Please flesh out your response...
As in do you approve of Obama's Israel tactics..over the last 8 years?
Do you approve of...Benjamin Netanyahu?
What say you?
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Are fans of John Hagee.
And how much to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE,Libya,Yemen,Lebanon,the Palestinian Authority,etc etc?
Do you now something about Susan Rice no one else knows?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.