Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Does so

Yes, that is true. What does it mean? Does it mean Germans were not ruthless enough? Does it mean the British were more humane and efficient?

Does it mean that the expansion of western civilization was a bad idea?

Figuring out what lesson should be learned is the hard part.


4 posted on 12/25/2016 3:47:05 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

The Dutch colonializations didn’t earn any prizes.


6 posted on 12/25/2016 3:48:30 AM PST by Does so ("The Business of America is Business"--President Calvin Coolidge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

The British, Spanish and Portuguese were less cruel than the German, French, Dutch and Belgian. Which is why the former have had a lasting impact


23 posted on 12/25/2016 11:38:13 AM PST by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Also this and what he Belgians did in the Congo or the Feench in Indo china was not expansion of western civilisation. The Belgians and Germans were cruel, kill em all, the French were cruel. The Dutch were only in it for creating captive markets and suppliers.


24 posted on 12/25/2016 11:40:38 AM PST by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson