Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Durbin Announces Push For National Popular Vote Legislation
U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) ^ | 12.20.16 | U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL)

Posted on 12/22/2016 10:20:32 AM PST by mdittmar

Urges states to join compact committing to winner of the national popular vote

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) today announced a renewed effort to amend the U.S. Constitution to honor the principle of “one person, one vote” in the election of U.S. President and Vice President. Durbin first proposed this constitutional amendment in 2000 and has supported it regardless of the outcome in previous presidential elections. Republican Congressman Ray LaHood joined Durbin in his earlier efforts.
 
Noting the challenges of passing a constitutional amendment, Durbin also called on states to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which would require each state’s electors to cast a ballot in favor of the candidate who won the national popular vote.
 
“Twice in recent memory, a majority of American voters cast their vote for the losing presidential candidate. This is certainly not what the Founders intended. It’s time to retire this 18th century invention that disenfranchises millions of Americans,” said Senator Durbin. “The American people deserve to choose all of their leaders, and I will continue to support efforts to empower voters. We face an uphill battle in Congress, but states have the power to act now by adopting the Compact and committing their electors to the candidate chosen by the voters.”
 
So far, 11 jurisdictions have entered the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact: Illinois, California, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. These jurisdictions represent a total of 165 Electoral College votes. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact will take effect when enough states have joined the Compact to represent a majority of electoral votes (270 of 538).


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Paladin2

Exactly. We keep hearing Hillary won the popular vote.

Hillary got 48% of the vote. She had a plurality but not a majority.

52% voted for someone other than Hillary.

Nobody bitched about the electoral college when Bill Clinton won two elections while getting less than 50% of the popular vote each time.


21 posted on 12/22/2016 10:33:20 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

arg....
Amreican = American
loosing = losing


22 posted on 12/22/2016 10:34:25 AM PST by stylin19a (Hey obamas-it's Ray Charles time - "Hit the Road Jack"...you know the rest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Geeze...let’s hope not but years from now, I do see this happening.


23 posted on 12/22/2016 10:35:00 AM PST by hsmomx3 (Love my Steelers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I would hope the states fights this to the death, and I also wish the States would use Article V to undo the 17th Amendment - Article I, §3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which senators were elected by state legislatures.


24 posted on 12/22/2016 10:35:20 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bereanrabbi

.
Doesn’t matter!

Trump beat her in popular votes too, by the 30,000,000 fraudulent votes democraps depend on.


25 posted on 12/22/2016 10:35:26 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
I'm quite sure that there was a large disparity in how many votes it took to get an EV in Calif. vs. Fla.

In Calif. the EVs are way cheaper. Somebody needs to investigate.

26 posted on 12/22/2016 10:35:53 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

It’s been reported that Clinton carried the popular vote because of her overwhelming votes in New York city, and LA county. She lost virtually over 90% of the other counties.

So, winning the popular vote is easy if you’re the incumbent party in these large urban centers, who provide income, jobs and other benefits to people, who will inturn vote for you.

We have idiots in congress, and this guy is one of the worst.


27 posted on 12/22/2016 10:37:42 AM PST by nikos1121 (I hear Kasich is being considered for post master general.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Mob rule proposed by “The Mob”.


28 posted on 12/22/2016 10:39:30 AM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Your point is ignored by the Old Main Media, and the other issue is that if you remove the Republic of Kalifornia popular vote, TRUMP WON THE POPULAR VOTE.

Do Americans want CA and NY picking the President from here on forward? Then the undoing of Article Two of the United States Constitution is just your ticket.




29 posted on 12/22/2016 10:39:59 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Dick Dirtbag just doing what he does.


30 posted on 12/22/2016 10:41:08 AM PST by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Senator Durbin, given that the Electoral College is defined in both the main text of the Constitution (Article I Section 2) and the 12th Amendment, good luck trying replace that with a pure popular vote! And the only way to do it is with a new Amendment to the Constitution.

You will need to get two-thirds of both houses of Congress to pass a resolution to enable the Amendment process, and three-fourths of all state legislatures to pass the Amendment itself. I highly doubt it will make it even out of Congress.

31 posted on 12/22/2016 10:41:12 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Because it is a great idea to let LA, the Northeast Corridor, and Chicago elect our presidents.


32 posted on 12/22/2016 10:41:17 AM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Trump won the plurality AND the majority of the popular vote in 48 states, removing the heavily-laden with criminaliens in CA/NY.


33 posted on 12/22/2016 10:41:29 AM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Dick Durbin is a... ...well, a dick.


34 posted on 12/22/2016 10:41:36 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

“Good luck with that,Dick. “

Tell Dick, “yeah, we can change that law the minute you and the senate sign off on voter ID cards for everyone.”

If there was voter ID, Democrats would never win another election and they know it.


35 posted on 12/22/2016 10:41:44 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Too. Much. Winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

He’s a real......”Richard”.


36 posted on 12/22/2016 10:43:44 AM PST by Right-wing Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
He knows his party's Commielistic policies are not accepted by the vast majority of Americans. As a result, he attempts to disenfranchise the voters in 48 States in order to maintain power and ensuring his party's further destruction of America.

This is an attempted coup and should be called as such.

37 posted on 12/22/2016 10:43:56 AM PST by capydick (“Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

He isn’t doing away with the Electoral College - which would take an Amendment.
He is demanding that the states join a pact to allocate their Electoral Votes to whoever wins the popular vote, which simply takes state legislation.
Most states would have be insane to do this, but you never know. Insanity is pretty widely spread these days.
Fortunately, these days most governors and legislatures are ‘Pubbie, which reduces the chance.


38 posted on 12/22/2016 10:44:26 AM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: C210N

.
I strongly suspect that he may have won all but Hawai’i
.


39 posted on 12/22/2016 10:44:48 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
You are absolutely correct.

Without the EC there would have been no nation.

If the communists in the democrat party want to push this chit, I would imagine that any state that so desired would have a pretty sound argument for walking out on the union that they joined, but can no longer find.

40 posted on 12/22/2016 10:44:51 AM PST by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson