Skip to comments.
Durbin Announces Push For National Popular Vote Legislation
U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) ^
| 12.20.16
| U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Posted on 12/22/2016 10:20:32 AM PST by mdittmar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: Paladin2
Exactly. We keep hearing Hillary won the popular vote.
Hillary got 48% of the vote. She had a plurality but not a majority.
52% voted for someone other than Hillary.
Nobody bitched about the electoral college when Bill Clinton won two elections while getting less than 50% of the popular vote each time.
To: stylin19a
arg....
Amreican = American
loosing = losing
22
posted on
12/22/2016 10:34:25 AM PST
by
stylin19a
(Hey obamas-it's Ray Charles time - "Hit the Road Jack"...you know the rest)
To: mdittmar
Geeze...let’s hope not but years from now, I do see this happening.
23
posted on
12/22/2016 10:35:00 AM PST
by
hsmomx3
(Love my Steelers!!)
To: mdittmar
I would hope the states fights this to the death, and I also wish the States would use Article V to undo the 17th Amendment - Article I, §3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which senators were elected by state legislatures.
24
posted on
12/22/2016 10:35:20 AM PST
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: bereanrabbi
.
Doesn’t matter!
Trump beat her in popular votes too, by the 30,000,000 fraudulent votes democraps depend on.
25
posted on
12/22/2016 10:35:26 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: Dilbert San Diego
I'm quite sure that there was a large disparity in how many votes it took to get an EV in Calif. vs. Fla.
In Calif. the EVs are way cheaper. Somebody needs to investigate.
26
posted on
12/22/2016 10:35:53 AM PST
by
Paladin2
(No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
To: Responsibility2nd
It’s been reported that Clinton carried the popular vote because of her overwhelming votes in New York city, and LA county. She lost virtually over 90% of the other counties.
So, winning the popular vote is easy if you’re the incumbent party in these large urban centers, who provide income, jobs and other benefits to people, who will inturn vote for you.
We have idiots in congress, and this guy is one of the worst.
27
posted on
12/22/2016 10:37:42 AM PST
by
nikos1121
(I hear Kasich is being considered for post master general.)
To: mdittmar
Mob rule proposed by “The Mob”.
28
posted on
12/22/2016 10:39:30 AM PST
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Dilbert San Diego
Your point is ignored by the Old Main Media, and the other issue is that if you remove the Republic of Kalifornia popular vote, TRUMP WON THE POPULAR VOTE.
Do Americans want CA and NY picking the President from here on forward? Then the undoing of Article Two of the United States Constitution is just your ticket.
29
posted on
12/22/2016 10:39:59 AM PST
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: mdittmar
Dick Dirtbag just doing what he does.
30
posted on
12/22/2016 10:41:08 AM PST
by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: mdittmar
Senator Durbin, given that the Electoral College is defined in both the main text of the Constitution (Article I Section 2) and the 12th Amendment, good luck trying replace that with a pure popular vote! And the only way to do it is with a new Amendment to the Constitution.
You will need to get two-thirds of both houses of Congress to pass a resolution to enable the Amendment process, and three-fourths of all state legislatures to pass the Amendment itself. I highly doubt it will make it even out of Congress.
31
posted on
12/22/2016 10:41:12 AM PST
by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: mdittmar
Because it is a great idea to let LA, the Northeast Corridor, and Chicago elect our presidents.
32
posted on
12/22/2016 10:41:17 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(Freedom Before Security!)
To: editor-surveyor
Trump won the plurality AND the majority of the popular vote in 48 states, removing the heavily-laden with criminaliens in CA/NY.
33
posted on
12/22/2016 10:41:29 AM PST
by
C210N
To: mdittmar
Dick Durbin is a... ...well, a dick.
34
posted on
12/22/2016 10:41:36 AM PST
by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
To: mdittmar
“Good luck with that,Dick. “
Tell Dick, “yeah, we can change that law the minute you and the senate sign off on voter ID cards for everyone.”
If there was voter ID, Democrats would never win another election and they know it.
35
posted on
12/22/2016 10:41:44 AM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Too. Much. Winning.)
To: mdittmar
He’s a real......”Richard”.
To: mdittmar
He knows his party's Commielistic policies are not accepted by the vast majority of Americans. As a result, he attempts to disenfranchise the voters in 48 States in order to maintain power and ensuring his party's further destruction of America.
This is an attempted coup and should be called as such.
37
posted on
12/22/2016 10:43:56 AM PST
by
capydick
(“Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face.)
To: HangnJudge
He isn’t doing away with the Electoral College - which would take an Amendment.
He is demanding that the states join a pact to allocate their Electoral Votes to whoever wins the popular vote, which simply takes state legislation.
Most states would have be insane to do this, but you never know. Insanity is pretty widely spread these days.
Fortunately, these days most governors and legislatures are ‘Pubbie, which reduces the chance.
38
posted on
12/22/2016 10:44:26 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(Freedom Before Security!)
To: C210N
.
I strongly suspect that he may have won all but Hawai’i
.
39
posted on
12/22/2016 10:44:48 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: Red Badger
You are absolutely correct.
Without the EC there would have been no nation.
If the communists in the democrat party want to push this chit, I would imagine that any state that so desired would have a pretty sound argument for walking out on the union that they joined, but can no longer find.
40
posted on
12/22/2016 10:44:51 AM PST
by
skimbell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson