Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: Seattle Kids Can Move Ahead with Climate Rights Case
cnsnews.com ^ | 12/22/16 | PHUONG LE

Posted on 12/22/2016 9:02:28 AM PST by ColdOne

SEATTLE (AP) — Eight Seattle children should have "their day in court" to argue that Washington state and others aren't protecting them from climate change, a judge ruled.

King County Superior Court Judge Hollis Hill on Monday allowed the young petitioners to move ahead in their case against the state, writing that "it is time for these youth to have the opportunity to address their concerns in a court of law, concerns raised under statute and under the state and federal constitutions."

The petitioners, between 12 and 16 years old, had asked the judge last month to find the state Department of Ecology in contempt for failing to adequately protect them and future generations from global warming.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; kidsthesedays; kingcounty; leftoids; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 12/22/2016 9:02:28 AM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

One more melon full of mush judge.

This is a farce!


2 posted on 12/22/2016 9:04:26 AM PST by DoughtyOne (jcon40, "Are we be coming into the age of Sanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

They should first have to prove Global Warming is real, even before they can show how it has hurt them.


3 posted on 12/22/2016 9:05:04 AM PST by Ingtar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I see profound issues involving separation of powers here. Essentially the Judge is turning a jury into a super legislature, dictating questions of public policy that are constitutionally left to the legislature.


4 posted on 12/22/2016 9:05:45 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Snowflakes want to be legally protected from the future ...


5 posted on 12/22/2016 9:06:20 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Seattle = San Fran north


6 posted on 12/22/2016 9:06:22 AM PST by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
"The petitioners, between 12 and 16 years old, had asked the judge last month to find the state Department of Ecology in contempt for failing to adequately protect them and future generations from global warming."

To find them "in contempt" of, or for, exactly what? I thought law was based on precise language and specific rules and obligations. How can something so nebulous be the grounds of a lawsuit?
7 posted on 12/22/2016 9:08:55 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

You cannot protect the climate from change... this judge is a buffoon.

The climate has changed since the earth was formed and will continue to change until it is a burnt out husk sitting inside the dying sun.


8 posted on 12/22/2016 9:10:03 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

It may be a Farce, I believe it is, but it is also an Opportunity to Finish Off the Global Warming Religious zealots by forcing them IN COURT UNDER THREAT OF PERJURY and PRISON, not to mention the FRAUD they have Perpetrated, to Actually Prove their Case, in which we all know they Can NOT DO.


9 posted on 12/22/2016 9:12:06 AM PST by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Trump needs to get rid of these so called “judges” like this. Retards should not be “judges”.


10 posted on 12/22/2016 9:12:18 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (As long as tyranny exists, the Constitution and Bill of Right will never be "outdated" or "obsolete")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Generally when one seeks injunctive relief they need demonstrate the harm. Is their position it is warmer? Well warmer means more areas of the planet can sustain humans through agriculture. This is what happens when the ABCs are forgotten in the schools and it becomes common fare to indoctrinate.

Find a blackboard, send them to it and make them write 500 times: I am too uninformed to render policy decisions.


11 posted on 12/22/2016 9:12:49 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

There is no global warming. These children are being manipulated by the climate lie to make you pay money and give up your stuff. The great news is that TRUMP IS HERE!!


12 posted on 12/22/2016 9:13:19 AM PST by WENDLE (Merry CHRISTx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

“Trump needs to get rid of these so called “judges” like this.”

He’s a county judge and Trump would have no authority to do so. However, the voters of King County could remove him in the next election. Given the political leanings of King County, I’m not holding my breath in anticipation of that happening.


13 posted on 12/22/2016 9:14:50 AM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

This type of crap has been orchestrated by Obama’s EPA. Have environmental wackos sue, then a judge rules in favor and “forces” the government to make the changes.


14 posted on 12/22/2016 9:15:36 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Democracy is the backup QB to a dictatorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Good for these kids. I applaud their efforts at activism to present their case before a judge. I also applaud their desire to learn what failure means as this case is going to be thrown out for its merits.

On a positive note, they can get a participation award that they can hang up in their bedrooms next to the picture of Justin Beiber.


15 posted on 12/22/2016 9:20:59 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Too. Much. Winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Judge is worse than a snowflake.


16 posted on 12/22/2016 9:25:34 AM PST by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

They are under 18. This is not a rational decision.

Now, if their parents or guardians want to sue on their behalf, that’s fine.


17 posted on 12/22/2016 9:28:17 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
I hope it's a loser pays deal, and the kids lose.

18 posted on 12/22/2016 9:28:59 AM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The good news is that AGW will have to make its case in court.


19 posted on 12/22/2016 9:29:50 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
"Generally when one seeks injunctive relief they need demonstrate the harm."

Well, won't they just rattle off a bunch of dire predictions about the effects of global warming as "proof" of the harm they've suffered or will suffer?

It seems that this opens up a can of worms. For example, someone could sue the government for not doing enough to fight terrorism, because terrorist acts still happen. Or, one could say that officials haven't done enough to make cars safe, or to prevent gun violence, or to cure cancer. These are all threats about which one could always do "more."

I guess my point is that a lawsuit based on hypotheticals - hypothetical damage and hypothetical solutions - is legal nihilism. This takes judicial activism one step closer to the abyss.
20 posted on 12/22/2016 9:31:07 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson