Where's the outrage over Russia's hack of the US election?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/10/opinions/how-politicians-let-russia-hack-americas-election-waldman/ ^ | December 10, 2016 | Paul Waldman

[McGruff]

Now we know: Russia was apparently trying very hard to get Donald Trump elected, and the two parties reacted very differently to that fact. We already knew that the Democratic National Committee had been hacked, as had the emails of John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton's campaign. We also knew that intelligence officials and independent cybersecurity analysts believed that those hacks came from Russia.

But Friday, The Washington Post reported that the intelligence community had definitively concluded that Russia was behind these hacks, not merely to sow chaos and destabilization but to help Trump win.

[jacknhoo]

Poor CNN. They have shot themselves in the foot. They’re like philandering spouses who have been found out and exposed, but steadfastly pretend to be faithful. The whole town knows they’re sluts.

[Secret Agent Man]

because it did not happen.

there was no hack. here was no conspiracy. hillary and the dems are queens of the imaginary republican conspiracies. while conspiring with soros.

[jsanders2001]

> Where’s the evidence? Innuendo and suspicion is not evidence.

The MSM is pushing the narrative that the CIA has determined/b> that Russia meddled led with the election saying that they allowed the Wikileaks from Assange to pass through their servers as proof. So I gues with that logic any servers that the Wikileaks posts went to are guilty as well, right. So I guess Yahoo or MSN is guilty of conspiring with the Nigerians to steal millions from me everytime I receive a 419 email eh? Sounds legit..../s

[jsanders2001]

> Where’s the evidence? Innuendo and suspicion is not evidence.

The MSM is pushing the narrative that the CIA has determined that Russia meddled led with the election saying that they allowed the Wikileaks from Assange to pass through their servers as proof. So I gues with that logic any servers that the Wikileaks posts went to are guilty as well, right. So I guess Yahoo or MSN is guilty of conspiring with the Nigerians to steal millions from me everytime I receive a 419 email eh? Sounds legit..../s

[The Great RJ]

So if. I am to believe this BS, the Russians stuffed the ballot boxes in a majority of US states with Trump votes thus “stealing” the election for Trump. However, the reality is that the actual emails from John Podesta, the DNC and Hillary were released by someone. The in the tank US media did not report any of this and instead ran fake news and Hillary campaign propaganda to bury whatever was in these emails. Only in Internet conservative media were the contents of these emails reported...again being denigrated by the in the tank media. Somehow this was enough to swing the election to Trump and had nothing to do with Hillary being distrusted, seen by many Americans as totally out of touch and years of Hillary and her ilk treating Americans in flyover country with utter disdain. Another liberal wet dream

[drpix]

EVEN IF Russia was responsible for the release of the wikileaks Hillary/Podesta/DNC emails, what should alarm America is that when today's Democrats are in control, Americans have to depend on Russia for what, Radio Free Europe, during the Soviet era, provided to those behinds the Iron Curtain... the truth a government controlled press withheld from them.

[drpix]

EVEN IF Russia was responsible for the release of the wikileaks Hillary/Podesta/DNC emails, what should alarm America is that when today's Democrats are in control, Americans have to depend on Russia for what, Radio Free Europe, during the Soviet era, provided to those behinds the Iron Curtain... the truth a government controlled press withheld from them.

[Salamander]

Also, there has never been such a thing as this:

I have never seen bikers leather up for a candidate like they have for him.

Every one of his rallies had bikers in the front, all of them willing to take a bullet for him.

This is something far beyond.

[Salamander]

Where’s the outrage over the “Arab spring” and Qaddafi?

[Candor7]

The CIA did not name ONE person who was responsible for the alleged hack.

Without any information at all, this so called story of Russian hacking is an EPIC FAIL.

There was no Russian hack, or we would now know the names of alleged Russian operatives who did it.

More likely it was a disgruntled Sanders supporter, a member of the Democrat liberal fascist hegemony.

[Salamander]

So...does that cute little thing come in a Hemi version?

[faucetman]

“Now we know”

WE DO????????????

[PA-RIVER]

The fact that Obama was raised to be a communist by an enemy of our country, who was under FBI surveillance as a direct threat to our country, never bothered these a-holes. They never reported it.

[9YearLurker]

Russia has hacked many political sites in the US—as the US has hacked many political sites here and abroad.

That doesn’t mean that they were the source of the Podesta emails at Wikileaks.

[RC one]

I have outrage all right but it isn’t directed at Donald Trump.

[clearcarbon]

Felony clinton and prison-yard podesta are still furious they got caught.

[windsorknot]

Where's the outrage...?

Where's the evidence? The only "hack" here seems to be Paul Waldman.

[PA-RIVER]

Russia hacked our election in 2008, and put Marxist bag o crap in our oval office.

“Please tell Vlad I will be more flexible after MY election”.

[honurider]

Hey that car looks like a PV544, my dad had one.

[arthurus]

Don’t look at the content! Content is unimportant! It’s the wrapper, dammit! look at the pretty wrapper! The content doesn’t mean anything! The Russians did it! They want you to be distracted from the Beautiful Wrapper by the content. It’s a conspiracy by the KKK and the Russians and those evil Christians to confuse you with the facts.