bttt
Another thread is saying the Federal Court of appeals ordered the recount to continue. Crossed wires somewhere.
It seems that the judge exceeded his authority when riling on a state matter
The federal ruling had to do only with moving the recount up early in time aka waived the 2 business day wait.
The federal judge ordered the two day delay between board ruling and appeal of board ruling, not apply. He assumed the recount would be ordered, so just front-loaded two days to it. The state court heard the appeal from the decision of the election board, and ruled “no recount.” Stein can take that back to the federal judge if she wants. She never asked the fedetral judge for the recount (that was already “in the works” pending appeal), she just asked for the two days.
Article III courts have no authority over the appointment of electors.
Their hearings should not be attended, no responses to their requests should issue, and their orders should be ignored.
If we do not hold the line on this obvious, bright line distinction, there will never be another election decided by the people.
This is a SOLE and EXCLUSIVE prerogative of State Legislatures. End of story, full stop.
state court says no
fed court says keep counting
There’s also a federal case. The state case just got stopped. Will the ICC get involved next?