It’s called “checks and balances”
Posted on 12/06/2016 2:54:43 PM PST by 867V309
More accountable to the taxpayers? Hardly.
Federal employees are not responsible for any of that. Can you say LEADERSHIP.
Who in their right mind asks such a stupid question? Should you ask “why are the production workers at Ford producing the Edsel?”
There is plenty to complain about wrt fed employees and the government but batshit crazy crap doesn’t even do that.
It’s glaring, those in government, from the floor of the Congress to the lowest pay-grades all point fingers of blame at each other, like you just did. In D.C. no one is responsible for anything.
And you’ve just admitted you’re a subordinate to bosses who are inept, corrupt, costly and reckless. So why do you continue working for these corrupt AHs? Is it the pension?
Btw, unlike what you do, production workers at Ford actually produced products that people want.
You have “submitted” to presidents of which you did not approve and, if military, to officers who were idiots.
You also forget I’m retired, most of my service was under Republican leadership.
It is beyond doubt that most people do support environmental goals. Mostly my job was involving sewer systems and their funding which people clearly want to work.
It’s called “checks and balances” and our government was designed that way.
In fact, most large organizations demonstrate the same features.
Aside from the military and border control, a cut could not be too big.
Cut until vital service problems take place.
It’s called “checks and balances”
Coming right up...an entirely new class of snowflake. Sucks to be a rentier.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.