[pfflier]

The federal issue is voting rights for the individual. That gives them strong influence at the state level if it can be argued that voters were disenfranchised.

The state has the constitutional authority on how to count votes and select electors for the EC.

Stein's argument was voter fraud via foreign hacking and she admitted that her legal team has no evidence of that.

IMO There should not be a recount just based on lack of standing/lack of evidence. The Republicans allowed the whole thing to progress this far by not aggressively fighting stein in the beginning.

[roostercogburn]

Agree.
I do believe the 6th will stop this. There was no proof of any shenanigans in the election.
Goldsmith went rogue trying to take over the process. No ther reason than that. Especially in light of him proclaiming that the count will not stop unless ordered by him.

[Alberta's Child]

There is no Federal “recount right” under any voting rights for an individual.

[Alberta's Child]

The Republicans allowed the whole thing to progress this far by not aggressively fighting stein in the beginning.

It makes no sense to "fight" something that involves a candidate pursuing a perfectly legal course of action. Sometimes you have to wait until steps are taken or decisions go against you before you even have the legal standing to fight anything.