I agree with Sarah...that you cannot just do this for a chosen few companies, but must incentivize, fairly (and, by NOT putting a strain on the taxpayer) and across the board.
I agree with Windy, that the timing of Sarah’s article, is not the best. The time for armchair quarterbacking will come, later. We need all good hands on deck, now. Let the man get into the White House for a while, at least, before issuing public warnings or concerns.
Exactly my point. Sarah's analysis is spot on, but it comes off as a criticism, mostly because it was done publicly.
I'm pretty sure that Sarah was listening (as we all were) when Trump promised to lower the corporate tax, and renegotiate our terrible trade deals to make America the best place on earth to do business.
I'd expect her to have a bit of patience, and let the man get in office to achieve those structural reforms before criticizing him for doing what he can, from his current position of limited influence.
What he just did with Carrier was more of a morale booster than anything else. It wasn't a harbinger of how he intends to do things after January.
Geez....I can’t believe I’m actually scolding Sarah.