NRO can’t get over Trump winning in spite of their sabbotage
It’s not a bailout. Like how they mislead and lie about tax cuts and deregulation.
NRO sounds just like Levin. They are stuck on crazy stupid.
I would rather Carrier keep their seven millions (over ten years) than give it to government to waste.
That seven hundred thousand a year will result in about $40 million in direct payroll income a year for those 1000 people, which even at a 10% tax rate results in $4 million a year in tax revenues.
Additionally think of all the money governments save in unemployment benefits, as well as probably food stamps and some welfare from not having 1000 people unemployed.
Are we going to see companies threaten to move just to get tax breaks and incentives? How are you going to tell the difference? I like the tariffs idea he originally had and hope he goes with that on a more national policy level.
“NRO can’t get over Trump winning in spite of their sabotage.”
It’s not just National Review that opposes deals such as what allegedly was offered to Carrier:
http://www.youngcons.com/sarah-palin-but-wait-the-good-guys-wont-win-with-more-crony-capitalism/
I have no use for Kevin W. generally and they have been on the wrong side of history all year—but he is right here.