Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Trump Forces Planning 'All Out' Legal Assault on Electoral College (lawsuits in 29 states)
Law News.com ^ | | 8:38 am, November 30th, 2016 | Rachel Stockman

Posted on 11/30/2016 9:50:35 AM PST by drewh

Anti-Trump forces are apparently planning an all out legal assault on the Electoral College in a last ditch effort to keep Donald Trump from taking office in the White House. The plan? To file legal action in all 29 states which have laws that prohibit electors from “voting their conscience.” In other words, laws that prevent electors from going against the state’s popular vote.

The inside scoop on what is being planned:

Leaders of the effort, mainly Democrats, have plans to challenge laws in the 29 states that force electors to support their party’s candidate. Those laws have never been tested, leaving some constitutional experts to argue they’re in conflict with the founders’ intention to establish a body that can evaluate the fitness of candidates for office and vote accordingly.

They’d still have to get 37 Republican electors to turn against Trump to have an impact on the election outcome. That’s going to be a tough task especially because there have been few reports that Republican electors are willing to abandon their party to vote against Trump. Sources said they will also have a coalition of lawyers that will be ready to defend (for free) anyone who votes in opposition to their party’s candidate when then the Electoral College meets on December 19.

Last week, Lawrence Lessig, a well-known professor of law at Harvard University and a political activist, penned an opinion piece in The Washington Post encouraging electors to cast their votes for Clinton despite Trump winning more votes in the Electoral College. His theory is that, while it has never been tested like this, the Electoral College is a “safety valve” that is intended “to confirm — or not — the people’s choice.

Other legal scholars believe that if the Electoral College abandons Trump, it may go against the rule of law. “Turning the electors into mighty platonic guardians doesn’t seem to be the right way to go,” UC Irvine Law Professor Rick Hasen wrote in a Friday blog post.

“So yes, I’d love to get rid of the Electoral College,” he wrote. “But not ignore it in an election where everyone agreed it was the set of rules to use.” LawNewz.com will follow this legal effort closely, and update you on this website.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016electoralcollege; 2016electors; antitrump; democrats; election; electoralcollege; lawsuits; moonbats; sorelosers; trump; trumptransition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-223 next last
To: drewh

So let’s say they win, and the electors vote exactly as they would have otherwise. Why do you think they volunteered to be electors? Somebody put a gun to their head? The post is hereditary? They knew about the law requiring them to vote according to the popular vote in their state, and they were ok with it. But go ahead. Do spend all your money on this nonsense. Unca George will give you more.


161 posted on 11/30/2016 2:27:31 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

As I recall, the Constitution leaves it to the states to manage their electors how they see fit.

Democrats are threatening the system because they lost. Sour grapes.


162 posted on 11/30/2016 2:30:19 PM PST by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
So they want a small group of people to decide the presidential race-not the popular vote?

The irony is thick with the left.

163 posted on 11/30/2016 2:34:49 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
I agree with the lawyers who say the electors should not be forced to pick their state’s winning candidate. That clearly goes against the founders’ intent and turns the electors into mere figureheads.

No, it doesn't.

It gives smaller and less populated states a voice in what happens in the country.

The number of electors is the same as the number of representatives from each state.

Just like the laws in this country are not decided by popular vote, but by the what the reps from each state say their state wants, so with the president.

Each states electors ARE voting for or should be voting for, the popular for FOR THEIR STATE.

The electoral college, giving a greater voice to less populous states, ensures that the whole nation is not overwhelmed by the popular vote that a democracy would give.

Do we really want a few blue, urban areas along the coasts to decide the fate of the entire nation?

The electoral college is also a buffer against election fraud.

This country is NOT a democracy, which many people don't understand. It's a representative republic of states.

The Constitution limits what the federal government can do and the rest is left up to the individual states.

164 posted on 11/30/2016 2:42:33 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Those laws don’t “prevent” any such thing. They merely impose a fine for non compliance. That fine can easily be negated by a third party being willing to pay it and maybe a little candy for the trouble.


165 posted on 11/30/2016 2:53:54 PM PST by arthurus (Mrs Clinton is The Great Conniver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Actually, that is Constitutionally possible.


166 posted on 11/30/2016 2:55:04 PM PST by arthurus (Mrs Clinton is The Great Conniver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

I think a lot, and I mean a LOT, of them are terrified they are finally going to pay for their crimes. I think wikileaks may be the tip of the iceberg of the corruption that has been going on for 20-30 years. I think the stock and bond markets may have had some very interesting influences on them that may come to a screeching halt if the swamp really is drained.


167 posted on 11/30/2016 3:07:37 PM PST by boxlunch (Pray for Donald Trump's safety, for his family and cabinet. Make America Good Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

OK I see where you are coming from I was just looking at the current amended document. The founders expectation came about because they never factored political parties into the equation. These they called “factions” and loathed them. The first, the Democrat-Republican, was created to stop Hamilton and became today’s Democrats.

It is somewhat ironic that the House has factored in only one election and that provoked the 12th amendment designed to prevent 1800 from happening again.


168 posted on 11/30/2016 3:07:39 PM PST by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman, Hater of the Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

Maine does something like that with its electors...should the system be adopted nation wide it would shut the naysayers up real fast!


169 posted on 11/30/2016 3:08:02 PM PST by mdmathis6 (BEWARE THE ABORTION POLITICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
I recommend A Magnificent Catastrophe: The Tumultuous Election of 1800, America's First Presidential Campaign by Edward J. Larson. It's the best book on the subject that I've found.
170 posted on 11/30/2016 3:10:38 PM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Good luck with that.


171 posted on 11/30/2016 3:10:55 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada; All

It would be interesting if Illinois downstaters began petitioning the congress for their own state separate from Cook county and Chicago...after all their interests and the interests of the urbanized northwest differ sharply. What would Chicago and the Dem’s in Peoria do if the whole of the downstaters went civil disobedient on them?


172 posted on 11/30/2016 3:14:07 PM PST by mdmathis6 (BEWARE THE ABORTION POLITICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

LOVE this passage.
LOVE the book of Isaiah!


173 posted on 11/30/2016 3:16:11 PM PST by pollywog (" O thou who changest not....ABIDE with me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

I see what you did there!


174 posted on 11/30/2016 3:22:26 PM PST by Rebelbase (Please consider donating to the emotional-support porcupine program for college safe spaces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

Sorry to burst your bubble but the Blue states are net positive contributors of federal taxes and that is likely due to the cities. Their inhabitants who actually produce these goods and pay those taxes also vote red but their votes are overwhelmed by those of the non-producers.

The whole concept of “civilization” comes from cities and there has been no civilization worthy of the name which did not have a major city at its center.

If Republicans could neutralize the parasitic class the cities would be republican. Our cities today reflect racist policies of the democrat party which drove millions of blacks from the South so rapidly that we still haven’t properly assimilated them. If we can show this group how Democrat programs have destroyed the black family and made areas of these cities a hellhole for all concerned we can win them back.

Blacks made up the core of the Republican party for decades basically until the democrat governors forced a showdown with the fedgov in the 60s and it was seen to have concern with their rights so Blacks considered the fedgov their friend. Even though the mechanism to enforce civil rights laws was established by Republicans, blacks turned to the Welfare policies of the Democrats.


175 posted on 11/30/2016 3:31:14 PM PST by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman, Hater of the Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

Yeah, I was thinking of the current document.


176 posted on 11/30/2016 3:34:28 PM PST by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman, Hater of the Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

The House also determined the president in the 1824 election.


177 posted on 11/30/2016 3:34:37 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Thanks for the reference. I have closely studied that election primarily in reference to Hamilton’s role in creating the issue and in resolving the dilemma.


178 posted on 11/30/2016 3:38:55 PM PST by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman, Hater of the Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Electors are unnecessary.

Just post the tally.


179 posted on 11/30/2016 3:39:03 PM PST by TheNext (ONE HOUR to AUTHENTICATE U.S. Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Another example of the Marxist Democrats “nullification” campaigns against American institution, customs, values, and esteem.


180 posted on 11/30/2016 3:42:00 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson