A final pathetic gasp by a failed executive. By the time new proposed regulations are published and the final rules are placed in the Federal Register, Trump & Co. will rescind them. This is a good example of what is wrong with DC.
Congress transfers legislative authority to agencies under the delegation doctrine, which can be a broad or specific grant of power. Rulemaking is one of the main mechanisms through which agencies act. Administrative rules, also referred to interchangeably as regulations, are adopted by agencies and are considered primary legal authority.
The process of rulemaking is governed by the Administrative Procedure Act. Generally, the APA requires a process that includes publication of the proposed rules, a period for comments and participation in the decision-making, and adoption and publication of the final rule. See 5 U.S.C. § 553. This is known as “notice and comment” or “informal” rulemaking (i.e., informal in comparison with the more complex process required for laws made by Congress).
Solution? Rescind the agencies and bureaus, starting with the EPA, just to create a liquidation template and to nail a scalp to his lodge pole.
I know personally that a proposed law can get 100% approval and still be rejected by a biased doofus administrator.
Why not just appoint a dictator-for-life, and let Congress "transfer" its legislative authority to him, a "broad" "grant of power" in perpetuity.
That way, they can all go home and collect cushy pensions for the rest of their lives, or until the dictator has a bad day and decides to have them all shot.
It's already been tried in Germany, and worked great there. /s /s /s
Why not just appoint a dictator-for-life, and let Congress "transfer" its legislative authority to him, a "broad" "grant of power" in perpetuity.
That way, they can all go home and collect cushy pensions for the rest of their lives, or until the dictator has a bad day and decides to have them all shot.
It's already been tried in Germany, and worked great there. /s /s /s