Many criminals never stop unless incarcerated or eliminated.
If the recount doesn’t uncover Hillary votes by illegals, unregistered, and dead voters, then the recount is rigged.
What the Heckyl and Jekyll do odds have to do with creating fraudulent votes?
Odds of success don’t matter when Soros makes fake ballots and adds to the counts.
Where are Trump’s injunctions?
Where is his team on this?
Exactly zero.
They can’t swing PA and without it, no Clinton presidency.
Libs are grasping for straws.
I mean this recount is being pressed by the same folks who last month demanded Trump accept the result.
Well - not them when they lose.
“... What Are The Odds Of A Successful Hillary Recount ..”
-
The odds are ZERO
bit that is not what this is all about ...
They are counting the votes for Trump and Hillary and claiming he lost the popular vote.
There were other candidates in the race, who also received votes
70,608,915 votes were cast for someone other than Hillary and she can never overcome those numbers.
That is a difference of 6,773,493 compared to the 63,835,422 votes she garnered.
She lost the popular vote, period.
Thanks for good article. I’m going to ignore news for next two weeks, no point getting upset about it. I seriously despise Dems and need to focus on the love and joy of the Christmas season.
God bless America and Donald Trump.
The correct percentage is ZERO!
I'm getting sick of FAKE NEWS BS!
I expect new found truckloads of ballots.
Largest deficit made up in a state wide recount was 700, Hillary needs 10,000, 30,000 and 70,000. No chance
California should demand a recount, and sort out all the illegals. Then Hilary would lose all our 50 (or so) EC votes. I bet she’d resist that.
Let it be known that Hillary & Co are soon to meet a grand jury.
I think all but the most deluded liberals recognize that Hillary has no chance of overturning the election results. However, that is not the intent the recounts. The Clinton’s are all about revenge and personal destruction. This is no different than Hitler ordering the destruction of Germany by his own troops when he knew the war was lost. Hillary wants to smear Trump, delegitimize his election and strut her fat butt saying that only she won the popular vote. These are the actions of a very mentally ill person.
But even though the Clinton camp already knows all of the facts presented in this article (and more) she still has made a move that amounts to a challenge of Trump’s victory.
So that tells me that it is a sure thing they have already set some sort of devious, underhanded plan into motion behind the scenes.
A plan to do something not considered in this article and not immediately obvious to those outside the Clinton camp.
Heck - the minute I heard Hillary’s concession speech I knew it was just too compassionate, smarmy and out of Character for her to be authentic.
She’s not going to let a little thing like respect for the election process stop her from trying a scam to steal the election any more than she let respect for the law stop her from breaking the laws as Secretary of State or using the Clinton Foundation as a scam to get rich off her government position.
The odds that the recount changes the election results are zero.
Sadly, statistics can be worthless in the hands of a single Justice.
Bookmark
During the presidential race its a fact that there was strong correlation between the state-specific polls that any responsible pollster would consider as they did their analysis. If Trump started doing better in Florida then one could assume he was also doing better in North Carolina and Ohio as some national events were impacting the race. The same would apply the opposite direction for North Carolina and Ohio if Hillary was doing better in Florida to some degree.
However in the case of recounts there should be NO correlation whatsoever in the process having any change in the results. The Election is long over with all the ballots counted. Thus any errors should be completely random in predicting what direction, if any, that the results would move. If there is any correlation then it would be do to some not-yet-detected bias/rigging which would be very illegal and unbecoming of our elections process.
So with this in mind - if the oddsmakers say that Hillary has a 1% chance of winning PA, 2% chance of winning WI, and 3% chance of winning MI then her total odds of winning the whole Presidential race is approx 0.0006% or about 1 in 160,000. In reality I think her odds are about 1/20th as likely in each of these 3 states so this 1 in 160,000 is more like 1 in 1.28 billion. However due to the risk of “rigging” I think her odds are better - about 1 in a million.
The real question is how much money is Stein going to get for her coffers and will she jump to the top of the dem playbill as a result of her little show.
“What Are The Odds ... “
Zero. She lost.