Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sourcery
1) The state cannot choose its electors using any process that violates the US Constitution (and necessarily any of its Amendments.)

So, for example, if the statute says that electors will be appointed by a vote of all black transsexuals over the age of 61, the Supreme Court would strike down their selection as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. (This is the basis on which they actually struck down Gore's proposed method of counting only specific kinds of votes in specific counties in Bush v. Gore.)

2) If the statute passes US Constitutional muster, only the Congress would be able to deny the electors' appointment. As a practical matter, that isn't going to happen.

40 posted on 11/27/2016 11:27:48 AM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna

Agreed.

However, a state has the Constitutional authority to choose Electors by direct vote of the legislature. Or by a random drawing.


41 posted on 11/27/2016 11:32:56 AM PST by sourcery (Non Acquiescit: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson