“The Supreme Court’s initial unanimous decision in the 2000 election dispute vacated the Florida Supreme Court’s first decision for failing to take into account this doctrine prohibiting state constitutions from constricting state legislative directions about the appointment of presidential electors. Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board (2000).”
http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/2/essays/79/presidential-electors
Nothing the state- including it’s legislature, courts or executive- does can interfere with the Constitutional power of the legislature to appoint electors.
There’s more on the issue at the link.
Not sure we have a disagreement though.
We have a disagreement if you’re saying that the Supreme Court ruled a state legislature doesn’t have the authority to set statutory requirements for the appointment of electors. The ruling says no such thing.
I’m not sure we have a disagreement either.
The issue is, who decides whether or not a state’s legislature has actually appointed any Electors? And who Constitutionally decides who has or has not been appointed by a state’s legislature?