enough brayin
I have read that PA’s recount bar is much higher than the other two. Because of Trump’s margin of victory, Stein has to go to court and demonstrate that enough fraud took place to change the outcome of the election. This will be all but impossible—yet without PA she cannot win.
Stein is actually probably hoping she fails in PA. Any leftover money from Soros’ bot contributor goes to the Green Party. If she spends a million apiece in WI and MI, that leaves her with upwards of three million to keep. Not bad, for the perennially underfunded/run on a shoestring Green Party.
The Democrat demands of a recount in three states poses an absurd scenario. First, when they recount the votes in the red counties, the vote totals might change, but it would change very little. So, they target the blue cities and counties. But this implies that Republicans somehow managed to get into election sites in blue areas, and manipulate voting machines, or stuff ballots. Really?
Another implication is that in areas controlled by Democrat mayors, elections offices, polling sites and the personnel at those sites, that these people are monstrously incompetent, and that they simply can't count. They can't be trusted to come up with accurate tallies, and why? Well, they are run by DEMOCRATS!
One can see having a county or city being under a recount for a local election for mayor, or member of a board of supervisors. But to target THREE states, and target the BLUE areas in those states because there is suspicion of hacking, and fraud by Republicans is ludicrous. If Stein wants to pay for a recount for HER votes, fine. I think she should not have standing to count votes for someone else.
I wrote this before the Clinton campaign admitted they were behind this.