Posted on 11/25/2016 6:44:21 AM PST by Lorianne
Well, the Clintoon Foundation’s actions in Haiti and elsewhere clearly demonstrates that idea.
Think India, think China.
Think Office Girls
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3489963/posts
for later
The globalist are not hard workers, they are grifters who are gifted with manipulative powers directly from hell! They lie, cheat, steal, and kill to obtain wealth. Wealth=Power, that is their real drug! The are not smarter just more devious and willing to do anything to get their way.
If Globalists have their way 99% of the world population will be dirt poor, but EQUALITY be achieved.
Remember the olympics when they were flying over the favelas and acting like it was the most natural thing in the world to have massive, sprawling ghettos? Almost glamorizing them.
Is that actual numbers, or is it adjusted for inflation?
Either way, whether you call it "socialism" or "feudalism", the basic desire of the elites to live in absolute luxury while the masses barely survive seems to be integral to their nature. (Elites who earned their wealth, like Trump, seem less likely to embrace this dynamic, but still do it.)
I think a lot of that desire stems from the fact that it is difficult to believe in one's own superiority if the people whom one is supposedly superior to have comfortable standards of living. It's a lot easier to feel one is superior when the masses have almost nothing; that also gives elites the opportunity to demonstrate magnanimity by giving the masses their used trenchers and table scraps (common practice of the rich in the Middle Ages).
The Clinton ‘Foundations/Slush Fund’ elite types ARE the corrupt worst. What they did in Haiti is typical... corruption feeding on the helpless.
Sigh.
Poverty has always been the norm, taken for granted because the exceptions were so rare and so clearly confined to the aristocracies, which varied in flavor in different cultures around the world but which were invariably tiny fractions of the population.
This began to change in the Age of Exploration, when the discovery of the New World opened the prospect of land ownership to common people from at least some European countries. The more important turning points, however, came later, with the Glorious Revolution, the evolution of a political/legal doctrine that respected individual liberty and property rights, and the closely-related onset of the industrial revolution. The rest is history.
Countries are prosperous today to the extent that they adopt the winning formula. This is a delicate cultural question. It is not a matter of white, European, Christian culture vs. everyone else; a number of countries in East Asia have taken to it more readily that southern Europe. Sub-Saharan Africa and the Arab world are the cultural retardates. And of course, any country, including our own, that becomes infected with the virus of socialist resentment can regress very quickly.
How did the world get this way? The world has always been this way. The question is, how has so much of the world escaped the trap? And how can we bring the retardates along?
For later
The Globalists want to make the 49% poor as well and the 1% will hold all the wealth
These countries aren't poor because other people are rich. They're poor because they're primitive, corrupt, lazy, or totally lacking in natural resources. None of that is the fault of the "wealthy," nor will redistribution of wealth alleviate the situation. The money would just be squandered or end up back in the hands of the wealthy anyway.
Get some ambition. Stop standing in line for handouts. Stop blaming everyone else for your failures. Kill the corrupt and criminal. Take control of your own economic destinies and quit milling around waiting for manna to drop into your laps.
Well stated IronJack!
A guy looked at my Corvette the other day and said I wonder how many people could have been fed for the money that sports car cost.
I replied I am not sure, it fed a lot of families in Bowling Green, Kentucky who built it, it fed the people who make the tires, it fed the people who made the components that went into it, it fed the people in the copper mine who mined the copper for the wires, it fed people in Decatur IL. at Caterpillar who make the trucks that haul the copper ore. It fed the trucking people who hauled it from the plant to the dealer and fed the people working at the dealership and their families. BUT... I have to admit, I guess I really don’t know how many people it fed.
That is the difference between capitalism and welfare mentality. When you buy something, you put money in people’s pockets, and give them dignity for their skills.
When you give someone something for nothing, you rob them of their dignity and self worth.
Capitalism is freely giving your money in exchange for something of value.
Socialism is taking your money against your will and shoving something down your throat that you never asked for.
When an individual or a government consistently spends more than their income, sooner or later the debt catches up to you and makes you a slave to someone.
The fix is to stop spending more than your income and start paying off your debt. The problem with the government is that they don’t want to face the music politically in order to do that, plus keeping your constituents dependent on the government solidifies their power. It takes people of character, from the bottom up, to change this.
Not so. The global elite want 9/10 of the earth’s population to be dirt poor.
Another story about the evil rich so the have not’s will know it’s the poor guy that will give them a job.
Spread the money their money that is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4wU9ZnAKAw
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
— David Rockefeller, Bilderberger Conference, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
— David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
— David Rockefeller
“But this present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts to erect an enduring structure of global interdependence.”
-—David Rockefeller, at the Business Council for the United Nations, September 14, 1994
These are just from one super-wealthy, megalomaniac. There are more. Here are a few others:
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
— Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1992
“US must not stop Syrian resettlement. It would be a threat to ‘global governance’”.
— David Miliband, former British Foreign Secretary who came to New York in 2013 to take the reins of the International Rescue Committee
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities...”
— Zbigniew Brzezinski from his book “Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technotronic Era”
“This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan, which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept.”
— Zbignew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter
“Every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances to our founding fathers, toward our elected officials, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It’s up to you as teachers to make all these sick children well – by creating the international child of the future”
— Dr. Chester M. Pierce, Psychiatrist, address to the Childhood International Education Seminar, 1973
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas…”
— G. Brock Chisholm, psychiatrist and co-founder of the World Federation of Mental Health
“We ... ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others ... And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine… States have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them; sovereignty is an illusion ... sovereignty is an absolute illusion that has to be put behind us.”
—Peter Sutherland, UN migration chief & chairman at Goldman Sachs bank, who wants to use (Muslim) immigration to destroy European countries’ culture
“If we are frank with ourselves, we shall admit that we are engaged on a deliberate and sustained and concentrated effort to impose limitations upon the sovereignty and independence of the fifty or sixty local sovereign independent States which at present partition the habitable surface of the earth and divide the political allegiance of mankind. It is just because we are really attacking the principle of local sovereignty that we keep on protesting our loyalty to it so loudly. … I will merely repeat that we are at present working, discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands…”
—Arnold Toynbee, Address to the 1931 Copenhagen conference as published in International Affairs: Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (November 1931)
They use the celebrities to talk for them. I cannot listen to someone making millions on a tv show for several minutes work an episode telling me I have to do with less.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.